77,624
edits
Pokémon Emerald Version: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
==Reception== | ==Reception== | ||
Many reviews criticized Emerald for being too similar to Ruby and Sapphire, with Game Informer stating that "there simply aren't enough changes to make this a must-buy."<ref>[http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/gba/pokemonemerald?q=pokemon 1 Pokemon Emerald (gba) reviews at Metacritic.com] (retrieved December 21, 2009)</ref> However, IGN gave the game an "Impressive" rating of 8/10, stating that there are "special, newly-created treats sprinkled throughout the experience to make experiencing this repeat worthwhile."<ref>[http://gameboy.ign.com/articles/609/609763p1.html IGN: Pokemon Emerald Version Review] (retrieved December 21, 2009)</ref> | Many reviews criticized Emerald for being too similar to Ruby and Sapphire, with Game Informer stating that "there simply aren't enough changes to make this a must-buy."<ref>[http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/gba/pokemonemerald?q=pokemon 1 Pokemon Emerald (gba) reviews at Metacritic.com] (retrieved December 21, 2009)</ref> However, IGN gave the game an "Impressive" rating of 8/10, stating that there are "special, newly-created treats sprinkled throughout the experience to make experiencing this repeat worthwhile."<ref>[http://gameboy.ign.com/articles/609/609763p1.html IGN: Pokemon Emerald Version Review] (retrieved December 21, 2009)</ref> | ||
==Staff== | |||
{{main|Staff of Pokémon Emerald}} | |||
==Trivia== | ==Trivia== | ||