Page history
16 April 2024
12 April 2024
11 April 2024
9 April 2024
31 March 2024
→Trivia: this is almost half of all mythical pokemon
m−267
TErapagos coutnas it has no fofical connection and wanted to mentiont ehre some mythical pokemon that are not offically assicoated or connected with other legenaries and mthcials.
m+288
This is no longer necessary now that the title is fully descriptive
m−17
Adjust contents in line with rename
−225
SnorlaxMonster moved page Legendary group to Groups of Legendary and Mythical Pokémon: Per talk page
m
29 March 2024
I don't think anyone is the master of the other in those relations
+132
Undo revision 3966661 by Trainersurrel0409 (talk) We already decided against this.
−13
I changed a few of the Pokémon forms to fit with each other, like Zacian and Zamazenta's Crowned Forms and Eternatus's Eternamax Form.
+13
I think a more descriptive title is a better option here
+51
28 March 2024
→Other relationships: Just trying to have some consistency in the Pokémon's roles here.
−53
Undo revision 3966176 by Trainersurrel0409 (talk) it was fine as it was
+14
→Undefined relationships
−14
25 March 2024
→Undefined relationships: minor cleanup
−47
Undo revision 3964372 by Trainersurrel0409 (talk) let's discuss these if they're a problem instead of just changing them all
−181
24 March 2024
22 March 2024
→Legendary Pokémon associated with a Legendary group: renamed
+8
no edit summary
mA small correction.
+2
→Undefined relationships: I thought this is a very similar situation to both Rayquaza and Deoxys, so i added it here, warn me if the description is not that good.
+1,409
no edit summary
m+24
15 March 2024
14 March 2024
Undo revision 3954697 by Trainersurrel0409 (talk) This page is about Legendary groups; neither of these Pokémon are part of a Legendary group.
−1,481
Since We can't have Ogerpon, the Loyal Three and Pecharunt in a single segment, i gave Ogerpon and Pecharunt their own due to their rivalry.
+1,231
12 March 2024
11 March 2024
10 March 2024
no edit summary
m+2
I think an image with all four members would be better for the page.
+18
→Other relationships
+399
Undo revision 3948587 by G44SP (talk) the difference is that terapagos and koraidon do not have a relationship or interact. The connection is far too loose to be worth noting here.
−2,074
→Undefined relationships
+233
Revertion. Terapagos & the Paradox Duo may not be a trio, but they are related just like the others on their section. A great example of a similar case is Eternatus and the Hero Duo. They are not part of a group, or have any real connection other than their battle during the Darkest Day. It is similar with Terapagos, as it also functions as a “third legendary” (even if not a trio) in this case bringing Koraidon and Miraidon into present time. Terapagos IS why we even get to see Koraidon/Miraidon
m+2,074
consistency
m−21
9 March 2024
Terapagos has a very indirect relationship to Miraidon/Koraidon, unlike all the other relationships in this section
m−2,055
→Legendary Pokémon associated with a Legendary group
−3
→Legendary Pokémon associated with a Legendary group
+2,058
3 March 2024
→Legendary Pokémon associated with a Legendary group
+135
→Legendary leaders: if we're not using this image at the top of the section, i'd rather use it here; explicitly setting image sizes; removing redundant "right" parameter
−21
don't forget the serial comma!
m+1
Fair enough, i just clarified their lack of interaction there because her image was included there. And now i added Solgaleo and Lunala there instead of the whole family.
+51
no edit summary
−102
Undo revision 3938174 by Trainersurrel0409 (talk). I get what you're going for here, but since Meloetta and Enamorus have never interacted, I feel this is better to omit; Cosmoem isn't super relevant here
−112
→Legendary Pokémon associated with a Legendary group
+112
29 February 2024
→Legendary Pokémon associated with a Legendary group
−17
→Legendary Pokémon associated with a Legendary group