Bulbapedia talk:Project Fandom: Difference between revisions

m (Undo revision 1631827 by DisgruntledGoat (talk) - Do not touch talk pages. Leave them as they are.)
Line 46: Line 46:


[http://www.pokemonpapercraft.net Pokémon Papercraft] - a site with really cool paper models of pokemon. (Currently there are 279 of 649; new model every week). I think it is very original among numerous fan-sites. Do you think it deserves an article? [[User:Ruxax|Ruxax]] 21:33, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
[http://www.pokemonpapercraft.net Pokémon Papercraft] - a site with really cool paper models of pokemon. (Currently there are 279 of 649; new model every week). I think it is very original among numerous fan-sites. Do you think it deserves an article? [[User:Ruxax|Ruxax]] 21:33, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
== Website notability requirements ==
Hi everyone, is there a clear set of requirements for notability with regards to websites? An article I created, [[Pokemon Database]] was recently deleted for being non-notable, but it is one of the most popular fan sites in the world today. Several other fan site pages exist that don't seem remotely notable. Some seem to be called notable for being the biggest Pokemon fan site in France in 2003 (of course, an unverified claim). Can we have some basic guidelines? [[User:DisgruntledGoat|DisgruntledGoat]] 15:45, 23 March 2012 (UTC)