19,673
edits
Bulbapedia talk:Policy: Difference between revisions
m
→Redirects for Typos: reply
(→Redirects for Typos: new section) |
m (→Redirects for Typos: reply) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Again, I can't imagine any sort of logical reason ''not'' to include redirects for misspellings of Pokémon's names. It's a good convenience with no downsides. This is why they are used on many other major Wikis. They are a fantastically useful feature of MetaWiki. [[User:Thelonesoldier|Thelonesoldier]] 09:28, 24 May 2011 (UTC) | Again, I can't imagine any sort of logical reason ''not'' to include redirects for misspellings of Pokémon's names. It's a good convenience with no downsides. This is why they are used on many other major Wikis. They are a fantastically useful feature of MetaWiki. [[User:Thelonesoldier|Thelonesoldier]] 09:28, 24 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I agree with you, to an extent. Some misspelling redirects are incredibly useful, but in the past they have got a bit ridiculous. I don't remember any examples off the top of my head, but we seriously had to think how someone would misspell some names in the ways they created redirects for. For things like repeated letters, or 'Feraligater' (which probably already exists) that should be okay. More input welcome. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 10:32, 24 May 2011 (UTC) | |||