There is no need for a Legendary Pokémon category. - 振霖T 12:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
There is no need for a Rare Pokémon category, either. Especially since the rarity of some Pokémon changes in games, which means issues arise regarding which ones to include and which ones to not. Is there anything you could contribute besides Pokémon categories? --Pie 13:31, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- I never called you stupid. I was pointing out a reason why the category isn't really worth it. --Pie 13:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- By the way? Uh, hi. I'm a style editor. Ignoring what I just said to you and re-reverting your work? Not always a smart idea. --Pie 13:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Image categorisation is not done on Bulbapedia. Also, categories, like articles, don't have title-case capitalisation. - 振霖T 06:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Don't you ever (a) rename a page just to make a redirect for it (b) move a page by copy-and-paste without moving the associated history and metadata. Pull a stunt like that again and there will be consequences. - 振霖T 15:41, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Don't categorise redundantly. - 振霖T 13:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Do categorise new articles. - 振霖T 11:06, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
"Do not submit the work of others without permission." That entire article on Pokémon Live! was copied from trsrockin.com. Please do not do that ever again. --PAK Man Talk 23:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
First of all, new Categories need to be Categorized as well. Secondly, we don't need a category for everything Diamond and Pearl. And third of all, NEVER use the word "things" in the title of anything encyclopedic. It's very unprofessional sounding. Especially with categories, since they can't be renamed. Also, I'm not sure if you noticed this, but we already have several Diamond and Pearl categories. Whether they be Pokémon Diamond and Pearl, Diamond and Pearl locations, Diamond and Pearl characters, etc. It's not good to excessively categorize. Please be careful the next time you add a category you think does not exist. --PAK Man Talk 16:01, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Moving pages
That's not how you rename pages. --PAK Man Talk 18:26, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
I'd recommend not adding anime/manga-only locations to them. Yes, they should be linked together, but really, I'd say they should just be kept in a separate template. After all, you saw how bloated it made the Kanto and Johto templates, imagine what it'd do in the Hoenn and Sinnoh ones! TTEchidna 20:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Link templates
Use them. seriously. Bulbasaur, Charmander, Squirtle, and a slew of others are disambig pages. So just in case (and because no one likes redirects) use the {{p}} template like so: {{p|Pikachu}} to link to Pikachu easily.
Use them for moves, abilities, and the like, as well. You just have to link it as Mewtwo learns Psychic to see what I mean when I say this. TTEchidna 09:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
List of pages in a Bulbapedia project
Don't make those, they can more easily be seen in the "what links here" part of the template pertaining to the project in question. TTEchidna 20:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Stop it!
Stop moving the trainer articles. We actually agreed on using old names (see Cool Trainer). So, please stop it. --Maxim 13:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)