18
edits
Talk:Eeveelution/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
Talk:Eeveelution/Featured article candidate (view source)
Revision as of 16:22, 10 December 2009
, 10 December 2009→Object (4)
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Agree.''' It is the best of Project Fandom. It is very well organized with tons of information. No major mistakes. It doesn't break any rules. It is well known. Kudos! --[[User:Landfish7| <font color="purple">Land</font>]][[User talk:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Broadway"><small><font color="blue">fish</font></small></span>]]<font color="red"><sup>7</sup></font> 21:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC) | *'''Agree.''' It is the best of Project Fandom. It is very well organized with tons of information. No major mistakes. It doesn't break any rules. It is well known. Kudos! --[[User:Landfish7| <font color="purple">Land</font>]][[User talk:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Broadway"><small><font color="blue">fish</font></small></span>]]<font color="red"><sup>7</sup></font> 21:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
====Object ( | ====Object (5)==== | ||
* '''Object.''' The initial paragraph is no more than a definition of the term "Eeveelution", while the rest of the article is basically a long-list of summaries of the different Eeveelutions, and a link to the main article. Images make up the bulk of this page. The article needs severe expansion, as well as in-depth discussion of what exactly this term and these Pokemon mean to the fandom that think they're worthy for their own general article. The trivia section is much too long with information that is hardly trivial at all, and would probably be better-suited for integration into the main article. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 20:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC) | * '''Object.''' The initial paragraph is no more than a definition of the term "Eeveelution", while the rest of the article is basically a long-list of summaries of the different Eeveelutions, and a link to the main article. Images make up the bulk of this page. The article needs severe expansion, as well as in-depth discussion of what exactly this term and these Pokemon mean to the fandom that think they're worthy for their own general article. The trivia section is much too long with information that is hardly trivial at all, and would probably be better-suited for integration into the main article. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 20:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
* '''Object.''' I think it's... too list-like. The large amount of blank space in the article looks really bad (Maybe put the comparison boxes side-by-side instead of on the right?) and... it's just kinda blank. The similarities in looks is notable for the ones introduced in the same gen, but other than that, a lot of the info is already on their respective articles. Definetely needs more content to it. ▫▪''[[User:Tina|<span style="color:#B16ABB;">Ťïňắ</span>]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Tina|<span style="color:#B16ABB;">♫</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Tina|<span style="color:#B16ABB;">♥</span>]]</sup> 21:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC) | * '''Object.''' I think it's... too list-like. The large amount of blank space in the article looks really bad (Maybe put the comparison boxes side-by-side instead of on the right?) and... it's just kinda blank. The similarities in looks is notable for the ones introduced in the same gen, but other than that, a lot of the info is already on their respective articles. Definetely needs more content to it. ▫▪''[[User:Tina|<span style="color:#B16ABB;">Ťïňắ</span>]]'' <sup>[[User talk:Tina|<span style="color:#B16ABB;">♫</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Tina|<span style="color:#B16ABB;">♥</span>]]</sup> 21:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC) | ||