User talk:Iliekmudkips: Difference between revisions

Putting all branches in all members of a branched evolution line is not the way things are done at many Pokémon sites.  [[serebii.net|Serebii]] doesn't do it, Bulbapedia doesn't do it, I could go on and on.  Maybe you ought to lay off licking (or should I say "[[Lick (move)|lieking]]") {{p|Mudkip}}s--who knows what's in their scales?!--and actually read the {{bp|manual of style}} and {{bp|notability requirements}} before making another snap judgement.--[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 22:53, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

:Using "Find" and searching for the string "evolv" (which will catch evolving and evolve), I only found a guideline covering the anime. If most of the rest of the population think inclusion of the forks are a mistake, I have no problem with the changes being removed. I also did not anticipate anyone becoming seriously upset by the change because content was only added, in a similar format to an already existing article, rather than content replaced or article style broken in a new way. Its a simple revert, its not like I templated out the evolutionary lines or anything major in terms of reformatting.