10
edits
Bulbapedia talk:Project Moves and Abilities: Difference between revisions
Bulbapedia talk:Project Moves and Abilities (view source)
Revision as of 18:20, 25 December 2007
, 25 December 2007New section: 'bats
m (→Confusion) |
Pinkgothic (talk | contribs) (New section: 'bats) |
||
| Line 211: | Line 211: | ||
::Do we have a Stub-section template or something? You could just add Effect headers to moves that don't have them, and stub them. They'll need effect listings at some point anyway, putting the section there would make it simple and noticeable to anyone else passing by, that the move needs it's effect written up. -- [[user:Jioruji Derako|<font color="#237d00">'''J'''ioruji '''D'''erako.'''>'''</font>]] 05:38, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | ::Do we have a Stub-section template or something? You could just add Effect headers to moves that don't have them, and stub them. They'll need effect listings at some point anyway, putting the section there would make it simple and noticeable to anyone else passing by, that the move needs it's effect written up. -- [[user:Jioruji Derako|<font color="#237d00">'''J'''ioruji '''D'''erako.'''>'''</font>]] 05:38, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::Quick check; seems that <nowiki>{{gamestub}}</nowiki> is the correct tag for that. Do we normally stub a section if it's unfinished, or are the tags reserved for only really unfinished articles? I would think at the least, if the Effect section is blank, then the page itself would qualify as a stub... -- [[user:Jioruji Derako|<font color="#237d00">'''J'''ioruji '''D'''erako.'''>'''</font>]] 05:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | :::Quick check; seems that <nowiki>{{gamestub}}</nowiki> is the correct tag for that. Do we normally stub a section if it's unfinished, or are the tags reserved for only really unfinished articles? I would think at the least, if the Effect section is blank, then the page itself would qualify as a stub... -- [[user:Jioruji Derako|<font color="#237d00">'''J'''ioruji '''D'''erako.'''>'''</font>]] 05:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
== 'bats == | |||
Hi guys, I figured this would be the best place to put this question, since it spans several articles: | |||
Do Zubat, Golbat and Crobat learn ''Scary Face'' in Generation II? Zubat and Golbat's pages say so, Crobat refers to ''Mean Look'' for that generation. I don't seem to find much conclusive evidence either way with a quick search online. The Mean Look page lists all three of them, though, for that generation; so my guess is that Scary Face should be removed from those move lists. Still, the situation's ambiguous enough that I'd rather someone with the game(s) at hand double-check that situation and clear up the inconsistency than 'be bold' myself. -[[User:Pinkgothic|Pinkgothic]] 18:20, 25 December 2007 (UTC) | |||