User talk:Carmenstar97/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

::I don't think you follow what I'm saying. If an evolutionary line has a unique type combination, then naturally it should follow that the types these Pokémon are weak to are unique as well. Stating that the Pokémon have a unique type combination is sufficient; there is no need to further detail the type effectiveness of that type combination. {{p|Snover}} and {{p|Abomasnow}} are the only non-{{t|Fairy}} types weak to both {{t|Steel}} and {{t|Poison}}? That's ''already'' implied through the fact that Snover and Abomasnow are the only {{2t|Grass|Ice}} Pokémon. --[[User:Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#95EB5C">Carmen<small>★</small></span>]] <small>''[[User talk:Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#FEBEE8">(Talk |</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Carmenstar97|<span style="color:#A6DAFC">contribs)</span>]]''</small> 21:48, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

::: I got that part. What I tried to ask you if it isn't nameworthy to tell that out of all the Pokémon evolutionary lines, only Snover and Abomasnow are weak to all the weaknesses of one type, in this case Fairy, neglecting the fact that Normal and Electric only have one weakness. [[User:Danny199|Danny199]] ([[User talk:Danny199|talk]]) 16:17, 2 February 2016 (UTC)