40,987
edits
Talk:Ditto (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
m
Reverted edits by Lquebecois (talk) to last revision by Pattyman
Lquebecois (talk | contribs) (→ditto... A normal type pokemon?: new section) |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by Lquebecois (talk) to last revision by Pattyman) |
||
| Line 266: | Line 266: | ||
:::It's just such a complicated procedure, requiring such complicity and specific effort (you have to go into battle with the goal of achieving this, it's not a tactic you can actually ever count on - even against 4x ice-weak Pokemon - or try on a whim) and luck, I just don't think it's worth being ''any'' trivia anywhere. Trivia shouldn't ''actually'' be entirely trivial. No one's ever going to come anywhere near this feat in any remotely normal circumstances. | :::It's just such a complicated procedure, requiring such complicity and specific effort (you have to go into battle with the goal of achieving this, it's not a tactic you can actually ever count on - even against 4x ice-weak Pokemon - or try on a whim) and luck, I just don't think it's worth being ''any'' trivia anywhere. Trivia shouldn't ''actually'' be entirely trivial. No one's ever going to come anywhere near this feat in any remotely normal circumstances. | ||
:::So if anything, I'd accept seeing this framed as "This is how you can ever ''possibly'' do max damage" for [[Damage]]. But pretty much anywhere else, there are way too many other factors for it to belong. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 09:49, 6 December 2013 (UTC) | :::So if anything, I'd accept seeing this framed as "This is how you can ever ''possibly'' do max damage" for [[Damage]]. But pretty much anywhere else, there are way too many other factors for it to belong. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 09:49, 6 December 2013 (UTC) | ||