424
edits
Talk:Type chart: Difference between revisions
m
→Merging article with Type
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
So, the Type Chart article's got a header saying "The contents of this article have been suggested to be merged into the page [[Type]]." I don't know how you other people use this page, but I use the page a lot as a quick reference. It's probably the article I use the most, and it's seldom for more than a few seconds. That's why I like how it's quite a short article with the chart I need in the top of the article. No scrolling, no extra time that's wasted. Of course, it depends on how it's implemented, but I'm pretty negative to the idea of merging this article with the [[Type]]-article. That's my five cents. [[User:Laxsill|Laxsill]] ([[User talk:Laxsill|talk]]) 14:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC) | So, the Type Chart article's got a header saying "The contents of this article have been suggested to be merged into the page [[Type]]." I don't know how you other people use this page, but I use the page a lot as a quick reference. It's probably the article I use the most, and it's seldom for more than a few seconds. That's why I like how it's quite a short article with the chart I need in the top of the article. No scrolling, no extra time that's wasted. Of course, it depends on how it's implemented, but I'm pretty negative to the idea of merging this article with the [[Type]]-article. That's my five cents. [[User:Laxsill|Laxsill]] ([[User talk:Laxsill|talk]]) 14:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
:I agree, although there should be a subsection on [[Type]] that shows the current type chart (not previous gen's) with a "main article" link to here. - [[User:Poikins|<span style="color:#fc880d">'''poi'''</span>]][[User talk:Poikins|<span style="color:#ff3333">'''kins'''</span>]] 17:46, 19 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Effectiveness Program == | == Effectiveness Program == | ||