2,743
edits
User talk:Jioruji Derako: Difference between revisions
m
→Transcluded sigs
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 264: | Line 264: | ||
::If you are not concerned about stress on servers, then why not? | ::If you are not concerned about stress on servers, then why not? | ||
::If you are just concerned about the size, I would be use a dummy template offcourse.[[User:UltimateSupreme|UltimateSupreme]]([[User talk:UltimateSupreme|T@lk]]) 17:35, 20 November 2012 (UTC) | ::If you are just concerned about the size, I would be use a dummy template offcourse.[[User:UltimateSupreme|UltimateSupreme]]([[User talk:UltimateSupreme|T@lk]]) 17:35, 20 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::I didn't say we weren't concerned about server stress, simply that it's not as large of an issue as it once was. | |||
:::The size limitation imposed by the preferences page itself is more than enough, in my opinion; a signature that requires even more coding than the signature field allows is, as I said before, either annoying coding-wise on a page, or excessive in its styling, or both. (the latter comes down to personal opinion, which is why we simply go with the character limit rather than judging signatures on a case-by-case basis.) --[[user:Jioruji_Derako|<font color="#237d00"> '''J'''ïörüjï</font>]] [[user talk:Jioruji Derako|<font color="#237d00">'''Ð'''ērākō.'''>'''</font>]] 18:34, 20 November 2012 (UTC) | |||