130
edits
Bulbapedia talk:Manual of style: Difference between revisions
→Evolutionary Stages: new section
SuperAipom7 (talk | contribs) |
Green Zubat (talk | contribs) (→Evolutionary Stages: new section) |
||
| Line 370: | Line 370: | ||
Should update this into the manual of style? :--[[User:SuperAipom7|<span style="color:orange">SuperAipom7</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:SuperAipom7|<span style="color:blue">Questions?</span>]])''</small> 13:51, 28 April 2011 (UTC) | Should update this into the manual of style? :--[[User:SuperAipom7|<span style="color:orange">SuperAipom7</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:SuperAipom7|<span style="color:blue">Questions?</span>]])''</small> 13:51, 28 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Looks like it's done already. :--[[User:SuperAipom7|<span style="color:orange">SuperAipom7</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:SuperAipom7|<span style="color:blue">Questions?</span>]])''</small> 01:06, 7 May 2011 (UTC) | :Looks like it's done already. :--[[User:SuperAipom7|<span style="color:orange">SuperAipom7</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:SuperAipom7|<span style="color:blue">Questions?</span>]])''</small> 01:06, 7 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Evolutionary Stages == | |||
Why exactly are the TCG terms frowned upon (e.g. basic Pokémon, 1st stage Pokémon etc.)? They seem less cumbersome than the (fan-made) terms 1st evolution, 2nd evolution etc. The article states that the problem was that Pikachu would be a basic Pokémon by TCG standards and yet has already evolved once...and what? I always took "Basic" to mean an unevolved Pokémon, ''excluding'' evolutions from the baby stage. I mean, I'm not a proper TCG fan but that seems to be the relationship between Basic & Baby Pokémon. I just think it would be better to use actual canon terminology for stages of evolution.[[User:Green Zubat|Green Zubat]] 18:36, 22 June 2011 (UTC) | |||