Talk:ROM hack: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 158: Line 158:


:Additionally, I'm sorry, but ROM hacks and other phony Pokémon games are not notable for their own articles no matter how "good" or "popular" they are.  That's why you got redirected.  If we were to consider one ROM hack notable enough for its own article, we'd have to consider several other ROM hacks notable as well, which in turn would lead to Bulbapedia becoming a huge mess as one would have to sort canon from fanon.  --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 02:13, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
:Additionally, I'm sorry, but ROM hacks and other phony Pokémon games are not notable for their own articles no matter how "good" or "popular" they are.  That's why you got redirected.  If we were to consider one ROM hack notable enough for its own article, we'd have to consider several other ROM hacks notable as well, which in turn would lead to Bulbapedia becoming a huge mess as one would have to sort canon from fanon.  --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 02:13, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
::Okay. Sorry for the mistake, and thank you. [[User:Sanjayasmypapaya|Sanjayasmypapaya]]