401
edits
Template talk:Availability: Difference between revisions
→Pal Park listing: new section
(→Possible bug - Platinum: new section) |
(→Pal Park listing: new section) |
||
| Line 162: | Line 162: | ||
Hi, just noticed that on Bulbasaur's page, Platinum appears coloured in whereas Diamond and Pearl don't, despite that Bulbasaur has the same availability in all three games. I looked at the source and noticed that Platinum was listed in exactly the same way as Diamond and Pearl, but appeared differently, so this seems to be a bug with the template. (I can't pretend to even slightly understand the wiki markup behind this template, so can't recommend a solution). [[User:Kidburla|Kidburla]] 13:00, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | Hi, just noticed that on Bulbasaur's page, Platinum appears coloured in whereas Diamond and Pearl don't, despite that Bulbasaur has the same availability in all three games. I looked at the source and noticed that Platinum was listed in exactly the same way as Diamond and Pearl, but appeared differently, so this seems to be a bug with the template. (I can't pretend to even slightly understand the wiki markup behind this template, so can't recommend a solution). [[User:Kidburla|Kidburla]] 13:00, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Pal Park listing == | |||
Thinking about how the Pokéwalker should appear has got me thinking about Pal Park in general. I think it is a bit strange that Pal Park appears as a separate row on the template, as it isn't a separate game. Instead of this, I figure we list it on the individual row listings, as e.g. "[[Pal Park]] ([[List of Pokémon by Pal Park location#Field|Field]])" rather than just putting "[[Pal Park]]" on the game row and then putting "[[List of Pokémon by Pal Park location#Field|Field]]" on a separate Pal Park row, which we have currently. If that makes any sense! [[User:Kidburla|Kidburla]] 13:05, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||