1,465
edits
User talk:Pumpkinking0192/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
→Grammatical dispute: new section
(→Trvia) |
KyleRGiggs (talk | contribs) (→Grammatical dispute: new section) |
||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
Ive been here longer than you have. Trivia does NOT mean unique. Its means INTERESTING, which they are. It does not have to be only one. Please stop removing them. [[User:Black60Dragon|<font color="black">'''Black'''</font><font color="red">'''Dragon'''</font>]] 17:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | Ive been here longer than you have. Trivia does NOT mean unique. Its means INTERESTING, which they are. It does not have to be only one. Please stop removing them. [[User:Black60Dragon|<font color="black">'''Black'''</font><font color="red">'''Dragon'''</font>]] 17:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Intimidation will get you nowhere. Yes, the definition of trivia used on many other wikis (especially on Wikia) is just anything interesting, but on Bulbapedia we try for a higher caliber encyclopedia. This includes, among other things, disallowing trivia below a certain threshold of notability, because otherwise they get ''un''interesting by the sheer massive volume of so-called "interesting" things that must be trudged through if a user reads the section. For trivia talking about how many of something fit certain criteria, our threshold is that only a single Pokemon, evolutionary family, or other unit can fit the criteria. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 18:05, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | :Intimidation will get you nowhere. Yes, the definition of trivia used on many other wikis (especially on Wikia) is just anything interesting, but on Bulbapedia we try for a higher caliber encyclopedia. This includes, among other things, disallowing trivia below a certain threshold of notability, because otherwise they get ''un''interesting by the sheer massive volume of so-called "interesting" things that must be trudged through if a user reads the section. For trivia talking about how many of something fit certain criteria, our threshold is that only a single Pokemon, evolutionary family, or other unit can fit the criteria. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 18:05, 17 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Grammatical dispute == | |||
Just to let you know that "was" means once it is but now not only. If using "was" in this sentence, it will lead a wrong message of any Pokémon other than Victini as the first one being available with this move. For example, once Victini is the first one being available with this move, but now, Rayquaza is the first one being available with this move. Fact is fact, and cannot be using any past tenses in a fact. KyleRGiggs 08:16, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | |||