Talk:Move variations: Difference between revisions

Talk:Move variations (view source)

No change in size , 12 January 2009

m

268

edits

Revision as of 15:57, 12 January 2009 (view source) Kaoz (talk \| contribs) (→‎This page needs work) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:03, 12 January 2009 (view source) Kaoz (talk \| contribs) m (→‎This page needs work: stupid finger slips...) Newer edit →
Line 168:		Line 168:
	:I never thought PP should be accounted for. A lot of the moves might have the same PP but if all the important other stuff is the same, the moves are pretty much variations! [[User:Toastypk\|<span style="color:#BB0000">'''''~Toastypk'''''</span>]] - [[User_Talk:Toastypk\|<span style="color:#770077">'''<sup>Loom.</sup></span>''']] 05:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)		:I never thought PP should be accounted for. A lot of the moves might have the same PP but if all the important other stuff is the same, the moves are pretty much variations! [[User:Toastypk\|<span style="color:#BB0000">'''''~Toastypk'''''</span>]] - [[User_Talk:Toastypk\|<span style="color:#770077">'''<sup>Loom.</sup></span>''']] 05:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

	Thief and Covet will never be counted as ~~vatiations~~ if taking PP into account. --[[User:Kaoz\|Kaoz]] 15:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)		Thief and Covet will never be counted as variations if taking PP into account. --[[User:Kaoz\|Kaoz]] 15:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)