Talk:Lugia (Pokémon): Difference between revisions

→‎Name Origin: new section
(→‎Name Origin: new section)
Line 10: Line 10:
The biology section here is heavily based upon its anime-canon version, which is not unique, rather than what is known about the unique game-canon version.  As such, it should be mentioned when it is referring to its presentation in the anime rather than the more universal qualities of the species.  As it is, the article treats Lugia as if all Lugia are Lugia from the anime, rather than legendary individuals unique to the game it is from.  [[User:Kumori Satosuke|Satosuke]] 02:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
The biology section here is heavily based upon its anime-canon version, which is not unique, rather than what is known about the unique game-canon version.  As such, it should be mentioned when it is referring to its presentation in the anime rather than the more universal qualities of the species.  As it is, the article treats Lugia as if all Lugia are Lugia from the anime, rather than legendary individuals unique to the game it is from.  [[User:Kumori Satosuke|Satosuke]] 02:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
:I do notice that every Pokemon has a section devoted to "In the Anime," "In the Manga," but nothing has a section called "In the Games." Sheesh, it's not like the games have no plot! [[User:IIMarckus|IIMarckus]] 02:46, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
:I do notice that every Pokemon has a section devoted to "In the Anime," "In the Manga," but nothing has a section called "In the Games." Sheesh, it's not like the games have no plot! [[User:IIMarckus|IIMarckus]] 02:46, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
== Name Origin ==
It does not seem at all relevant to mention Luigi here. Does anyone agree?? I didn't wanna be a jerk and just delete it. [[User:Bnjelinski|Bnjelinski]] 14:24, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[[User:bnjelinski|Soon to be Mrs. Shirley]]
50

edits