1,956
edits
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
Celadonkey (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 395: | Line 395: | ||
:::::FWIW, a very explicit, unambiguous statement is always *best*. Taking the twist and turns of inference always leaves a door for some mistake somewhere, somehow (and I don't mean by the inferrers). | :::::FWIW, a very explicit, unambiguous statement is always *best*. Taking the twist and turns of inference always leaves a door for some mistake somewhere, somehow (and I don't mean by the inferrers). | ||
:::::That said, I understand the logic and can't argue it. Just, like I said, I would personally be happiest to have a very explicit attribution. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 22:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC) | :::::That said, I understand the logic and can't argue it. Just, like I said, I would personally be happiest to have a very explicit attribution. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 22:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
::::::Yeah, I can understand that you, being a mod, would like that. No worries. --[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#287a43">Celad</span>]][[User_talk:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#e85545">onkey</span>]] 22:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC) |
edits