3
edits
(→Type) |
(→Magearna's type: new section) |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
Nobody has yet leaked its stats or egg groups. [[User:Sumwun|sumwun]] ([[User talk:Sumwun|talk]]) 04:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC) | Nobody has yet leaked its stats or egg groups. [[User:Sumwun|sumwun]] ([[User talk:Sumwun|talk]]) 04:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
:The [http://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-news/a-new-mythical-pokemon-has-been-discovered/ official site] explicitly states that it is Mythical. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 04:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC) | :The [http://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-news/a-new-mythical-pokemon-has-been-discovered/ official site] explicitly states that it is Mythical. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 04:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Magearna's type == | |||
I just thought I'd say... | |||
When Magearna was revealed, I was calling that it would be Steel/Fairy, because it looked like it could be a Diancie clone. | |||
I just want to say... | |||
CALLED IT! | |||
[[User:Quickscoper9669|Quickscoper9669]] ([[User talk:Quickscoper9669|talk]]) 09:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC) |
edits