User talk:MisterE13: Difference between revisions

Line 463: Line 463:
Except I was told only two of my comments were hostile, and the second one was completely appropriate.  Pokegeek continued to remove my comments after claiming that I removed talkpage comments, telling me it was wrong.  That's hypocrisy and rule breaking, thus I had every right to say Pokegeek was being a hypocrite--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 05:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Except I was told only two of my comments were hostile, and the second one was completely appropriate.  Pokegeek continued to remove my comments after claiming that I removed talkpage comments, telling me it was wrong.  That's hypocrisy and rule breaking, thus I had every right to say Pokegeek was being a hypocrite--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 05:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
:Poke.geek removed ''one'' of your comments, which was an addition to a poll which was closed a month earlier. It was a legitimate removal. None of your further comments were removed by Poke.geek. Also, it is up to the admins to determine the extent of rule breaking, not the users. Certainly not the users involved (even if one is an admin), as there will always be a bias. I am going to ask that you drop the issue. It is not your place to request blocks on users. Blocks can be given or not given at the discression of a staff member ranked administrator or higher. Not at the discression of any user. The block given to you was justified, that's the only part of the matter that concerns you. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 05:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
:Poke.geek removed ''one'' of your comments, which was an addition to a poll which was closed a month earlier. It was a legitimate removal. None of your further comments were removed by Poke.geek. Also, it is up to the admins to determine the extent of rule breaking, not the users. Certainly not the users involved (even if one is an admin), as there will always be a bias. I am going to ask that you drop the issue. It is not your place to request blocks on users. Blocks can be given or not given at the discression of a staff member ranked administrator or higher. Not at the discression of any user. The block given to you was justified, that's the only part of the matter that concerns you. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 05:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
::So you'd continue to allow bullying as long as the victim is subject to additional double standards?--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 06:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
1,252

edits