Talk:N: Difference between revisions

183 bytes added ,  20 April 2011
Line 82: Line 82:


This would explain the discrepancies between the various last words given in the article (and the one I have).  Can anyone check if this theory is correct?  —[[User:Minimiscience|Minimiscience]] 02:52, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
This would explain the discrepancies between the various last words given in the article (and the one I have).  Can anyone check if this theory is correct?  —[[User:Minimiscience|Minimiscience]] 02:52, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
:It is correct. The article lacks the two "No" scripts you refer to, in order to include all four scripts for the two scenarios. [[User:Nechifor|Nechifor]] 09:09, 20 April 2011 (UTC)


== Name origin ==
== Name origin ==


The name for 'N' could mean more than just the Latin letter; N's frequent mathematical references in his speech (such as formulas) suggest an origin to the common variable given to the set of natural numbers (see this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_number ). What to make of a connection between N and natural numbers is speculation (although they go to infinity much like the surface area of his Menger sponge on his belt), but would it be fair enough to at least add to his name origin that this refers to a common variable used in mathematics? [[User:Chicobo329|Chicobo329]] 00:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
The name for 'N' could mean more than just the Latin letter; N's frequent mathematical references in his speech (such as formulas) suggest an origin to the common variable given to the set of natural numbers (see this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_number ). What to make of a connection between N and natural numbers is speculation (although they go to infinity much like the surface area of his Menger sponge on his belt), but would it be fair enough to at least add to his name origin that this refers to a common variable used in mathematics? [[User:Chicobo329|Chicobo329]] 00:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
62

edits