767
edits
User talk:Unown Lord: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Unown Lord (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Unown Lord (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
::Every user is entilted to his own opinion, and a responsible Admin would put all the reasons, not(Called an admin a Vandal)--[[User:DCM|<font color="#FF1111">DCM</font>]]<sub>[[User talk:DCM|((<font color="#DAA520">Talk</font>]]</sub><sub>[[Special:Contributions/DCM|<font color="#C0C0C0">Contributions</font>))]]</sub> | ::Every user is entilted to his own opinion, and a responsible Admin would put all the reasons, not(Called an admin a Vandal)--[[User:DCM|<font color="#FF1111">DCM</font>]]<sub>[[User talk:DCM|((<font color="#DAA520">Talk</font>]]</sub><sub>[[Special:Contributions/DCM|<font color="#C0C0C0">Contributions</font>))]]</sub> | ||
::: The fact that he called an admin a vandal entails that he engaged in an edit war with said admin. Guardian insisted that the new forms had different types simply because Serebii had previously noted that was the ''impression''. I explained to Guardian that the actual source of the forms' data - Arty2 - had indicated that the forms did not have new types. Despite this, he | ::: The fact that he called an admin a vandal entails that he engaged in an edit war with said admin. Guardian insisted that the new forms had different types simply because Serebii had previously noted that that was the ''impression''. I explained to Guardian that the actual source of the forms' data - Arty2 - had indicated that the forms did not have new types. Despite this, he chose to respond like a brat by calling me a vandal, pretending that I was not an admin after I had pointed out I was, and by generally being hypocritical (accusing me of stating an opinion as fact when he was the one doing just that). | ||
::: The reasons for my blocking him are clear just from looking at his recent contributions, and there is no need for me to list a block of text in one sentence. You seem to think that the admins need to clarify their position for the other users. I am doing so because that is the right thing to do, but it is not required of me to have to explain to myself. In this case, my actions are quite self-explanatory. --[[User:Unown Lord|Unown Lord]] 21:58, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | ::: The reasons for my blocking him are clear just from looking at his recent contributions, and there is no need for me to list a block of text in one sentence. You seem to think that the admins need to clarify their position for the other users. I am doing so because that is the right thing to do, but it is not required of me to have to explain to myself. In this case, my actions are quite self-explanatory. --[[User:Unown Lord|Unown Lord]] 21:58, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | ||