Talk:Porta Vista: Difference between revisions

Talk:Porta Vista (view source)

Revision as of 04:31, 9 December 2023

159 bytes added , 9 December 2023

→‎Aopulco?

Dannyjenn

139

edits

Revision as of 04:20, 9 December 2023 (view source) Dannyjenn (talk \| contribs) (→‎Aopulco?: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 04:31, 9 December 2023 (view source) Dannyjenn (talk \| contribs) (→‎Aopulco?) Newer edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Can somebody verify that the Japanese name is correct? I mean the spelling of アオプルコ Aopulco. Because... why would it be アオプルコ Aopulco when we'd expect アカプルコ Acapulco? It looks like it's the latter, and somebody just mistook the カ for an オ. Maybe it was being copied from a low-res screenshot or sloppy handwriting or something, since the カ and オ letterforms do look kind of similar. (Though I suppose maybe it could be deliberate, as they did with Yungeller for Yurigeller, and similar names) [[User:Dannyjenn\|Dannyjenn]] ([[User talk:Dannyjenn\|talk]]) 04:20, 9 December 2023 (UTC)		Can somebody verify that the Japanese name is correct? I mean the spelling of アオプルコ Aopulco. Because... why would it be アオプルコ Aopulco when we'd expect アカプルコ Acapulco? It looks like it's the latter, and somebody just mistook the カ for an オ. Maybe it was being copied from a low-res screenshot or sloppy handwriting or something, since the カ and オ letterforms do look kind of similar. (Though I suppose maybe it could be deliberate, as they did with Yungeller for Yurigeller, and similar names) [[User:Dannyjenn\|Dannyjenn]] ([[User talk:Dannyjenn\|talk]]) 04:20, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
			: Never mind. I just checked and アオプルコ Aopulco is correct. [[User:Dannyjenn\|Dannyjenn]] ([[User talk:Dannyjenn\|talk]]) 04:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)