40,987
edits
Talk:Ash's Rowlet: Difference between revisions
→Evolved/NFE
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
::::Claim 1 does not imply Claim 2 just because you already know from separate knowledge that Claim 2 is true. That's not how logic works. | ::::Claim 1 does not imply Claim 2 just because you already know from separate knowledge that Claim 2 is true. That's not how logic works. | ||
::::I'm not trying to argue that Claim 2 is false. I'm arguing that Claim 1's truth ''in and of itself'' does not automatically imply Claim 2 is true, as you seem to think. Both claims have separate truth values that are not dependent on one another. You need prior knowledge, it doesn't work by implication. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 06:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC) | ::::I'm not trying to argue that Claim 2 is false. I'm arguing that Claim 1's truth ''in and of itself'' does not automatically imply Claim 2 is true, as you seem to think. Both claims have separate truth values that are not dependent on one another. You need prior knowledge, it doesn't work by implication. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 06:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::::The first sentence in my second response already covers what it, but you're being waaaaaaaaaay too complicated and thinking waaaaaaay too hard on this. It's not that complex and doesn't have to be that complex. It shouldn't matter if someone doesn't know that all but Rowlet is fully evolved, that's not our problem to solve. That's on the user to figure that out on their own. The trivia is working on the assumption that everyone knows all but Rowlet is fully evolved.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 06:36, 21 October 2019 (UTC) | |||