805
edits
Talk:Diancie (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
→Regarding Diancie the other two leaked Pokemon
(→Regarding Diancie the other two leaked Pokemon: new section) |
|||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
It is possible that it could be higher or lower. We don't know the IVs and/or EVs of the Diancie in the screenshots. --<b>[[User talk:Relicant|<span style="color:#EBEBEB;">The</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Relicant|<span style="color:#F08030;">Truth</span>]]</b> aka Relicant 19:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | It is possible that it could be higher or lower. We don't know the IVs and/or EVs of the Diancie in the screenshots. --<b>[[User talk:Relicant|<span style="color:#EBEBEB;">The</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Relicant|<span style="color:#F08030;">Truth</span>]]</b> aka Relicant 19:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Regarding Diancie the other two leaked Pokemon == | == Regarding Diancie and the other two leaked Pokemon == | ||
A while back when the Gen IV and V games first launched, we had articles of Pokemon like [[Arceus]] and [[Genesect]] well before official sources revealed them or gave them artwork. So why with Gen VI we're being forced to wait for official sources to reveal these event legendaries before we start articles on them? | A while back when the Gen IV and V games first launched, we had articles of Pokemon like [[Arceus]] and [[Genesect]] well before official sources revealed them or gave them artwork. So why with Gen VI we're being forced to wait for official sources to reveal these event legendaries before we start articles on them? [[User:Superjustinbros.|Superjustinbros.]] ([[User talk:Superjustinbros.|talk]]) 19:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC) | ||