597
edits
Talk:Chip Away (move): Difference between revisions
→Accuracy: CONFIRMED: only 100% accuracy, able to miss
Stratelier (talk | contribs) |
Stratelier (talk | contribs) (→Accuracy: CONFIRMED: only 100% accuracy, able to miss) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It's not affected by evasion, the article says, this and the fact that it says "100%" accuracy on the infobox leads me to believe that it is affected by accuracy. If so, I think it should be mentioned in the article. Though I'm not sure if it is or not. [[User:Malake256|Malake256]] 21:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC) | It's not affected by evasion, the article says, this and the fact that it says "100%" accuracy on the infobox leads me to believe that it is affected by accuracy. If so, I think it should be mentioned in the article. Though I'm not sure if it is or not. [[User:Malake256|Malake256]] 21:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
: I agree. Moves that cannot miss generally say "---" accuracy to differentiate them from moves with 100% accuracy, but this needs to be tested (in both G5 and G6) to confirm. --''[[User:Stratelier|Stratelier]]'' 23:47, 3 December 2013 (UTC) | : I agree. Moves that cannot miss generally say "---" accuracy to differentiate them from moves with 100% accuracy, but this needs to be tested (in both G5 and G6) to confirm. --''[[User:Stratelier|Stratelier]]'' 23:47, 3 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
: UPDATE - I can confirm that (at least in [[Generation VI]]) Chip away does '''not''' ignore changes to the user's accuracy - it does have only 100% accuracy. I fished up some {{p|Basculin}} in [[Laverre City]], and while no amount of {{m|Double Team}}s saved my Gardevoir from Chip Away, as little as two {{m|Flash}}es did. --''[[User:Stratelier|Stratelier]]'' 00:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC) | |||