Talk:Bug (type): Difference between revisions

Talk:Bug (type) (view source)

962 bytes added , 19 December 2012

19

edits

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 PS.:Sorry for my bad english, I speak Portuguese. --[[User:Igor Castro Chucre|Igor ]] ([[User talk:Igor Castro Chucre|talk]]) 14:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 :We know. We're waiting for the games to come out first. It could always be a typo. [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] ([[User talk:Ataro|talk]]) 14:45, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
+The bug type number and percentages of pokemon is kind of silly. It has variables to account for multiple forms of wormadam, which I have two problems with:
+) If wormadam's additional forms are considered separate pokemon for how many bug types there are, then they should also be considered separate pokemon for the total of pokemon there are, reducing their alternate percentage 10% even.
+) If wormadamn's additional forms are counted on some merit other than their pokedex number (in this case, I would wager it's because of type combinations) Then pokemon that have alternate forms that fit this criteria, namely Rotom, should be counted in "total pokemon", dropping the percentage further (especially if it merely becomes forms with alternate movesets).
+Basically, the line with wormadam is either unnecessary, or not given enough attention. [[User:TheHateHat|TheHateHat]] ([[User talk:TheHateHat|talk]]) 21:35, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
+== Wormadam ==
 The bug type number and percentages of pokemon is kind of silly. It has variables to account for multiple forms of wormadam, which I have two problems with: