153
edits
Talk:M10: Difference between revisions
→Ho-oH trivia
| Line 183: | Line 183: | ||
:: I have now taken that bit of False trivia out -- [[User:D558|D558]] 03:30, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | :: I have now taken that bit of False trivia out -- [[User:D558|D558]] 03:30, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::I'm extremely sure it shows the transformation, and yes, we're talking about the Lucario movie. We wouldn't be shooting you down without knowing what we were talking about.—[[User:Urutapu|Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？]] ([[User talk:Urutapu|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Urutapu|contribs]]) 03:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | :::I'm extremely sure it shows the transformation, and yes, we're talking about the Lucario movie. We wouldn't be shooting you down without knowing what we were talking about.—[[User:Urutapu|Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？]] ([[User talk:Urutapu|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Urutapu|contribs]]) 03:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::: Just watched it... In just the first few minutes right after the movie intro speech in Lucario and the Mystery of Mew A Ho-oh flies out of the mist near the tree. Even in the distant fog it is still a soaring bird shape right up | :::: Just watched it... In just the first few minutes right after the movie intro speech in Lucario and the Mystery of Mew A Ho-oh flies out of the mist near the tree. Even in the distant fog it is still a soaring bird shape right up until it leaves the screen. Always Ho-oh, never shown that it is mew. I'm Right! Mew far later in the movie being a Ho-oh doesn't prove in any way that the pokemon shown flying out of the Tree's crater is mew no more than anyone can prove that Ash's Pikachu in the balloon while entering the city is Pikachu and not mew. Lawyered. -- [[User:D558|D558]] 04:13, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::: Uh, by your logic, the Ho-Oh in Darkrai could be a Mew because it ''could have'' transformed before it came on-screen. I think most people are going to and were meant to assume that if a Ho-Oh leaves the Tree then comes back and turns into Mew, it's the same animal.—[[User:Urutapu|Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？]] ([[User talk:Urutapu|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Urutapu|contribs]]) 05:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | ::::: Uh, by your logic, the Ho-Oh in Darkrai could be a Mew because it ''could have'' transformed before it came on-screen. I think most people are going to and were meant to assume that if a Ho-Oh leaves the Tree then comes back and turns into Mew, it's the same animal.—[[User:Urutapu|Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？]] ([[User talk:Urutapu|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Urutapu|contribs]]) 05:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::::: No... it's ''your'' logic that dictates that just because mew was transformed into that pokemon later in the movie means that any pokemon shown before can't be trusted to be real. (ok admittedly my wording with the pikachu thing was confusing, I meant to make it seem that if u assume the Ho-oh is mew ''why not'' pikachu in some minor scenes)-- [[User:D558|D558]] 14:59, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | |||