Bulbapedia talk:Project Pokédex/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

(→‎Pokémon Channel +: new section)
(→‎Pokémon pictures: new section)
Line 436: Line 436:
Last thing I promise! In the "In the anime" section for some articles, the subtitles are Major appearances and Minor appearances. Are they all going to be put in this format eventually?
Last thing I promise! In the "In the anime" section for some articles, the subtitles are Major appearances and Minor appearances. Are they all going to be put in this format eventually?
Sorry for writing so much.. I'm full of questions. --[[User:Snowrunt|<span style="color:#FFD700">'''ℓaℓa'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Snowrunt|<span style="color:#534F4B">ℓe</span>]] [[User talk:Snowrunt|<span style="color:#FF9900">'''snoωrunt'''</span>]] 00:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for writing so much.. I'm full of questions. --[[User:Snowrunt|<span style="color:#FFD700">'''ℓaℓa'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Snowrunt|<span style="color:#534F4B">ℓe</span>]] [[User talk:Snowrunt|<span style="color:#FF9900">'''snoωrunt'''</span>]] 00:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
== Pokémon pictures ==
This is just a suggestion... do you think it would be better not to use the Emerald and Platinum artwork on the Hoenn and Sinnoh starters' pages?  I've noticed that on the official online Pokédexes, as well as recent official books, their RS and DP artwork is still used, and appears the be their "standard" artork. I know they are the more recent, but Ken Sugimori's Emerald and Platinum illustrations are simply promotional art for those games, and are not considered "standard" by Nintendo.  What I'm trying to say is, if Bulbapedia were an official Pokémon site overseen by Nintendo, the Emerald and Platinum artwork wouldn't be used in the main articles, they would use the RS and DP art instead.  Does anyone agree with me?  Sorry if I made this sound confusing, I didn't really know how else to put it!  [[User:Taromon777|Taromon777]] 15:27, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
984

edits