Talk:Legendary Pokémon/Archive2: Difference between revisions

Line 1,069: Line 1,069:
:Hoopa is not in the Hoenn regional Pokédex, but is in the Kalos regional Pokédex. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 23:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
:Hoopa is not in the Hoenn regional Pokédex, but is in the Kalos regional Pokédex. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 23:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
::This is superficially similar to the pre-Emerald Deoxys situation, which is exactly why we usually group Pokémon by generation rather than by region. [[User:Bwburke94|Bwburke94]] ([[User talk:Bwburke94|talk]]) 03:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
::This is superficially similar to the pre-Emerald Deoxys situation, which is exactly why we usually group Pokémon by generation rather than by region. [[User:Bwburke94|Bwburke94]] ([[User talk:Bwburke94|talk]]) 03:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
== Redefining Mythical Pokémon? ==
In a discussion about Deoxys over at [[Talk:Delta Episode#Deoxys|Talk:Delta Episode]], we came across the difficulty of defining Deoxys according to Bulbapedia's current definition of a "Mythical Pokémon". It seems that the official Pokémon team has not released any sort of information about Deoxys' reclassification as "Legendary" instead of "Mythical", but it is now a Pokémon integral to in-game progress due to the Delta Episode. Considering they may never officially reclassify Deoxys as "Legendary", what is the best option for Bulbapedia in terms of dealing with Deoxys, or even the definition of "Mythical"? [[User: CWallace |<span style="font-family: Tw Cen MT;color:#00CED1">C.Wallace</span>]] ([[User_talk: CWallace |<span style="font-family: Tw Cen MT">Talk</span>]]|[[Special:Contributions/CWallace|<span style="font-family: Tw Cen MT">Contribs</span>]]) 13:59, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
163

edits