152
edits
Talk:Compound Eyes (Ability): Difference between revisions
→Stacking: new section
(→Stacking: new section) |
|||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
:::::Well, it's certainly not known, but your findings do give the appearance that something is making rare Pokémon more common (it's hard to say if it's Compound Eyes though). Eevee are usually very rare, but you encountered them most often. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 08:51, 16 March 2014 (UTC) | :::::Well, it's certainly not known, but your findings do give the appearance that something is making rare Pokémon more common (it's hard to say if it's Compound Eyes though). Eevee are usually very rare, but you encountered them most often. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 08:51, 16 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
::::::250 encounters in Connecting Cave, since that's an easy one to deal with (4 possible encounters, 3 of which are average and 1 rare), results 69 Zubat, 77 Whismur, 81 Meditite, and 23 Axew, which looks close enough to expected that I'd say earlier was either one hell of a fluke, or something's affecting things but I don't know what it *is*. For the record, the only thing in my party was a L30 Vivillion with Compound Eyes, no item held, and I just ran from every battle after noting what it was. Occam's, I'd say it was a statistical freak, I suppose. Unless someone wants to try replicate it, or has some idea I have missed?--[[User:Eazeh|Eazeh]] ([[User talk:Eazeh|talk]]) 20:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC) | ::::::250 encounters in Connecting Cave, since that's an easy one to deal with (4 possible encounters, 3 of which are average and 1 rare), results 69 Zubat, 77 Whismur, 81 Meditite, and 23 Axew, which looks close enough to expected that I'd say earlier was either one hell of a fluke, or something's affecting things but I don't know what it *is*. For the record, the only thing in my party was a L30 Vivillion with Compound Eyes, no item held, and I just ran from every battle after noting what it was. Occam's, I'd say it was a statistical freak, I suppose. Unless someone wants to try replicate it, or has some idea I have missed?--[[User:Eazeh|Eazeh]] ([[User talk:Eazeh|talk]]) 20:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Stacking == | |||
Does Compound Eyes stack with Wide Lens? | |||
I.e. does Wide Lens apply before the Compound Eyes, and then Compound Eyes applies on that accuracy value? | |||
E.g. Hurricane = 70%, Wide Lens gives 77%, and Compound Eyes acting on that 77% = 100.1% = 100% accuracy for Compound Eyes Hurricane. | |||
Or, does Compound Eyes apply on the move's accuracy independent of any held item, and Wide Lens apply on the move's accuracy independent of any ability? | |||
E.g. Hurricane = 70%, Wide Lens gives +7%, Compound Eyes gives + 21% = 98% total accuracy. | |||