Talk:Charon: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 165: Line 165:
:::::As for being rude, I edited the page, and then someone reverted it back without even bothering to respond to my comment on the talk page. That was certainly rude of him. If there's an edit conflict, isn't it some sort of policy to actually discuss the conflict?
:::::As for being rude, I edited the page, and then someone reverted it back without even bothering to respond to my comment on the talk page. That was certainly rude of him. If there's an edit conflict, isn't it some sort of policy to actually discuss the conflict?
:::::I'm pretty sure it's also policy not to post theories as fact on this wiki, and that is what this whole "Charon discovered and named Rotom" thing is: a theory. [[User:Pokemega32|Pokemega32]] ([[User talk:Pokemega32|talk]]) 18:58, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
:::::I'm pretty sure it's also policy not to post theories as fact on this wiki, and that is what this whole "Charon discovered and named Rotom" thing is: a theory. [[User:Pokemega32|Pokemega32]] ([[User talk:Pokemega32|talk]]) 18:58, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
And again, no response. Look, I personally don't believe that Charon wrote the journal. But that doesn't matter. What does matter is that there is no conclusive evidence that he did. Thus, it should not be treated as fact. [[User:Pokemega32|Pokemega32]] ([[User talk:Pokemega32|talk]]) 08:06, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
214

edits