User talk:Adil/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

Line 10: Line 10:
::『'''''Please check the dates''' of a discussion before you reply to it. '''Unless there a is good reason''' for revitalizing an old conversation, comments on sections older than six months old will be removed. This is because by this point the problems cited will have been '''cleared up'''.''』
::『'''''Please check the dates''' of a discussion before you reply to it. '''Unless there a is good reason''' for revitalizing an old conversation, comments on sections older than six months old will be removed. This is because by this point the problems cited will have been '''cleared up'''.''』
:::The six months has been given here just in case if the case/dispute/issue has not been resolved till that time, which was clearly not the case here. So, please take care of it in the future, have a nice day. <span style="color:#FF0">♫♪</span>[[User:Adyniz|<span style="color:#00FA9A;">'''エイデ'''</span>]][[User talk:Adyniz|<span style="color:#9F9;">'''ィニズ'''</span>]]<span style="color:#FF0">♪♫</span> 15:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
:::The six months has been given here just in case if the case/dispute/issue has not been resolved till that time, which was clearly not the case here. So, please take care of it in the future, have a nice day. <span style="color:#FF0">♫♪</span>[[User:Adyniz|<span style="color:#00FA9A;">'''エイデ'''</span>]][[User talk:Adyniz|<span style="color:#9F9;">'''ィニズ'''</span>]]<span style="color:#FF0">♪♫</span> 15:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
::::Misinformation causing a discussion to end does not clear up the issue? The noodle in question was what the discussion was about, whether or not it pertains to the article well enough is not up to me to decide, the original poster obviously felt that the article would be improved with information about noodles otherwise they wouldn't have posted about it? [[User:Felinoel|felinoel]] 15:34, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
613

edits