1,546
edits
User talk:Atrius97: Difference between revisions
→Side Series Table
Eternium-Z (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| (21 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
Okay, so about that {{p|Wurmple}} [[evolution]] thing. | Okay, so about that {{p|Wurmple}} [[evolution]] thing. | ||
Just because {{p|Goomy}} can evolve into two different form of {{p| | Just because {{p|Goomy}} can evolve into two different form of {{p|Sliggoo}} doesn't really mean that it has branched evolutions. Regardless of what form Goomy evolves into (whether its [[Kalos]]ian Sliggoo or [[Hisui]]an Sliggoo), it always evolves into the same Pokémon: Sliggoo. So Wurmple is the only Pokémon with branched evolutions that can both evolve.[[User:Eternium-Z|Eternium-Z]] ([[User talk:Eternium-Z|talk]]) 21:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC) | ||
:Except that's not the definition of a Pokémon with branched evolutions. If you look at the [[List of Pokémon with branched evolutions]] page, there are multiple examples where a Pokemon can evolve into two different forms of the same species. Unless you would like to gut that page and remove any Pokemon that "has branched evolutionary path that leads to two forms of the same species" to retroactively change the definition, that trivia remains false. [[User:Atrius97|Atrius97]] ([[User talk:Atrius97|talk]]) 22:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
::Can we at least state that they are both the only Pokémon with this trait?[[User:Eternium-Z|Eternium-Z]] ([[User talk:Eternium-Z|talk]]) 07:54, 4 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::If that were true, it wouldn't be unique and therefore it would not be notable as trivia, and it is already noted on the List of Pokémon with branched evolutions page. [[User:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Tahoma"><font color="F34134">'''Land'''</font>]][[User talk:Landfish7|<span style="font-family:Tahoma"><small><font color="8334B7">'''fish7'''</font></small></span></span>]] 08:10, 4 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Redirect links == | |||
Please avoid making redirect links. For example: instead of <nowiki>[[gift|gifted]]</nowiki>, write <nowiki>{{pkmn2|gift}}ed</nowiki>, and instead of <nowiki>[[Shiny]]</nowiki>, write <nowiki>{{Shiny}}</nowiki>. Thank you. --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 09:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
:Noted, I will try to remember and use that style going forward. [[User:Atrius97|Atrius97]] ([[User talk:Atrius97|talk]]) 09:58, 4 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you. Much appreciated. --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 10:12, 4 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::Oh, and I believe the asterisks (*) on your Shinylock notes are unnecessary. --[[User:FinnishPokéFan92|FinnishPokéFan92]] ([[User talk:FinnishPokéFan92|talk]]) 10:14, 4 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::Most of the time I've been mimicking the style and formatting I had found on other pages/the page I'm working on, so apologies if I've accidentally propagated something that doesn't quite fit the style, I can go back and fix them up as I find them. [[User:Atrius97|Atrius97]] ([[User talk:Atrius97|talk]]) 11:26, 4 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Redlinks == | |||
Not all red links are evil. It's okay to have red links to articles we would actually want.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#44BAE5">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#85D2EE">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#DA7D99">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#E7ABBD">ire</span>]] 08:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC) | |||
:Noted, I just thought it would be better to link to where information about that feature currently resides. As it stands, the Walking Pokémon page does contain everything written about "Let's Go" at the moment. I'm not sure if it's own page would be required if the Walking Pokémon section was expanded with more info, nor an "Auto Battle" page if that information is included as well. [[User:Atrius97|Atrius97]] ([[User talk:Atrius97|talk]]) 18:21, 20 November 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Tera Raid Bosses == | |||
Are you going to complete the list of Tera Raid Bosses? If not, where can I find the needed information? [[User:CrazyPikmin|CrazyPikmin]] ([[User talk:CrazyPikmin|talk]]) 08:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
: I will eventually, but if you feel the urge, the raid encounter tables can be dumped using a tool like [https://github.com/kwsch/pkNX pkNX]. Some other fan sites already used that method to obtain the data and organized it into encounter tables, such as [https://www.serebii.net/scarletviolet/teraraidbattles.shtml Serebii], but if you're not using a direct source/other fansite, you should cross reference multiple sources and/or confirm ingame. [[User:Atrius97|Atrius97]] ([[User talk:Atrius97|talk]]) 00:27, 11 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Side Series Table == | |||
Hi! I noticed you made some changes to the side series page's table. The same table exists on the Pokemon games page as well, displaying the same information, and all of those edits probably have to copied to the Pokemon games side series table. (Excluding the Pokewalker's inclusion. I think it's disputed on if it is a game, and if it isn't a game then it's obviously not a side series game, which is why another user removed it from the Pokemon games side series table.) | |||
Should I copy over the changes you made from the side series page to the Pokemon games page or would you rather do the honors? [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 14:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
: I think it's fair to copy the entire table to the other page, Pokéwalker included, and you're welcome to. If I understand correctly, it was finally agreed upon to add the Pokéwalker to that category which is why it appears there, although I'm not 100% sure where that discussion/decision took place. [[User:Atrius97|Atrius97]] ([[User talk:Atrius97|talk]]) 01:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I don't think there was a discussion. My understanding of what happened, with the caveat that there may be an even older talk page involved, is that one user put Pokewalker in the side series template ([[Template talk:Side series]]) to no dissenting opinion, and then it just stayed that way for three years. So when I put Pokewalker up on the side series table on the main games page, which has higher visibility than a template talk page, it wound up reverted by a staff member. (They did not revert the identical change I made to the table on the side series page, probably because it is less visible than the main game page) I'm currently waiting on an answer, which is especially important because staff opinion is involved. Until then, I'm stuck assuming dispute. For now, I think I should wait 2 more days for a response, then copy over the table if nothing happens. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 02:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
::: I think that's a fair judgement. I would also look through the relevant talk pages if you haven't already to see if any staff made a determination one way or the other, and check the talk pages for users that did the reverting in the past to see if it was discussed there. It may also be productive to bring it up on the Bulbapedia Discord server, as many of the editors discuss things there as well. [[User:Atrius97|Atrius97]] ([[User talk:Atrius97|talk]]) 08:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC) | |||