637
edits
Talk:Nintendo Independent Wiki Alliance: Difference between revisions
Talk:Nintendo Independent Wiki Alliance (view source)
Revision as of 09:07, 21 September 2020
, 21 September 2020FEW URL change
(Undo revision 2059265 by Groudon 60 (talk) Do not respond to very old conversations.) |
RotaRaichu (talk | contribs) (FEW URL change) |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
Unless I have recently lost my ability to count, I count only 21 wikis in the lists, despite everyone saying there are 22 wikis in NIWA. Is there a reason 1 is missing or is it that everyone who says 22 is wrong? - [[User:Groudon 60|Groudon 60]] ([[User talk:Groudon 60|talk]]) 16:30, 18 January 2014 (UTC) | Unless I have recently lost my ability to count, I count only 21 wikis in the lists, despite everyone saying there are 22 wikis in NIWA. Is there a reason 1 is missing or is it that everyone who says 22 is wrong? - [[User:Groudon 60|Groudon 60]] ([[User talk:Groudon 60|talk]]) 16:30, 18 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Probably counts Pikmin Fanon. [[User:Eridanus|Eridanus]] ([[User talk:Eridanus|talk]]) 17:28, 18 January 2014 (UTC) | :Probably counts Pikmin Fanon. [[User:Eridanus|Eridanus]] ([[User talk:Eridanus|talk]]) 17:28, 18 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
::Hard Drop Tetris Wiki recently joined, and the admins didn't have time to implement it on the main page. [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 15:29, 19 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Hard Drop Tetris Wiki == | |||
Since it doesn't have a page, could someone add the page about Hard Drop Tetris Wiki? --[[User:Cinday123|<span style="color:pink">Cinday123</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Cinday123|<span style="color:lightblue">Talk</span>]])''</small> 10:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
Actually I'm not sure we should have all these individual articles on our affiliates. They have nothing to do with Pokémon. Should we keep those NIWA articles and create a Hard Drop article? Or delete them all? We already have a [[NintendoWiki|wiki]] that has pages of each wiki because that is the wiki for Nintendo in general. But as we are the Pokémon Wiki and these articles have literally nothing to do with Pokémon, they shouldn't be here. The Mario Wiki article doesn't mention its' Smash Bros. content and Smash Wiki doesn't mention the Pokémon pages. And even when we add that information, that won't be enough. I can write an article about {{p|Pikachu}} appearing with [http://sonic.wikia.com/wiki/User:SeanWheeler/Pikachu Sonic] (despite only appearing in two Smash Bros. games, [[Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 3DS/Wii U|one]] of which isn't released yet) better than connecting the F-Zero Wiki to Pokémon. I've even asked the guys at Smash Wiki if they can have articles of the NIWA wikis describing their Smash coverage, but Toomai rejected the idea, and the Super Mario Wiki article I created before the response wasn't very good. And the affiliates has more Smash Bros. than Pokémon. I asked about why we have this articles on our [[Talk:Super Mario Wiki|Mario Wiki talk page]] and {{U|Chickasaurus}} agreed that these articles are irrelevant and should just redirect to Nintendo Independent Wiki Alliance. Judging by the fact we don't have Hard Drop in the mainspace, either the admins are still trying to decide on the NIWA articles or are working on Hard Drop in the userspace. But after a search, it seems Hard Drop isn't even in the userspace, so looks no one is even working on it. Well, better to wait to decide how we handle these affiliate articles. I mean, just because they are partners with Bulbapedia, grants them an article despite having little to no Pokémon content? [[User:SeanWheeler|SeanWheeler]] ([[User talk:SeanWheeler|talk]]) 02:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
:I agree. They're poorly written and off-topic. [[User:Mountain Drew|Mountain Drew]] ([[User talk:Mountain Drew|talk]]) 21:18, 22 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
::This late in the game, all of our affiliates will retain their articles, and any new affiliates will still have articles created about them. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 21:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Inkipedia == | |||
It appears NIWA now has a new member: [http://splatoonwiki.org/wiki/Main_Page Inkipedia], a wiki for Splatoon. We'll need to update this and everything related to NIWA accordingly. Also, how are we doing a link template for this one? [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 16:38, 4 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
:A interwiki prefix needs to be added to the interwiki prefix table before a link template can be created. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 17:31, 4 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
::Not sure what we'll be using as an interwiki prefix, to be honest, as ip is already taken by Icaruspedia... [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 17:38, 4 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::I would recommend <code>ik</code> or <code>in</code> as those don't appear to be language codes or taken by other affiliates. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 17:48, 4 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
::::Both sound good as candidates. I wonder what the others think. [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 17:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::::ink is straight-forward and really has no chance of being used for anything else. Something might come up that in would be good for. <small>[[User:Glik|glik]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Glik|glak]]</sup> 18:03, 4 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Fire Emblem Wiki == | |||
Looks like FEW changed their main page URL from [http://www.fireemblemwiki.org/Main_Page] to [http://www.firemeblemwiki.org]. The old URL 404s. I think this need to be changed on the NIWA template, and the page for FEW, unsure where else. [[User:RotaRaichu|RotaRaichu]] ([[User talk:RotaRaichu|talk]]) 09:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC) | |||