40,987
edits
Talk:M05: Difference between revisions
→Movie 5 box office trivia.
(→Roughly, when is this set: reply) |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Name= | ==Missingno??== | ||
In the original Gen 1 games, two of the forms of Missingno were a Kabutops fossil and an Aerodactyl fossil. Is it a coincidence that a Kabutops and an Aerodactyl were raised from the dead in this movie? | |||
==Name== | |||
Wasn't Pokémon Heroes the name of the combination of the main movie and the Pikachu Short, while the name of the main movie was ''Latios & Latias''?--[[User:Johans|Johans]] 18:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC) | Wasn't Pokémon Heroes the name of the combination of the main movie and the Pikachu Short, while the name of the main movie was ''Latios & Latias''?--[[User:Johans|Johans]] 18:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Watching the movie, the logo shows the title as ''Pokémon Heroes: Latios & Latias''. On the other hand, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Pok%C3%A9mon_Heroes.jpg the DVD itself] (containing the movie and the Pikachu Short) could be read as ''Pokémon Heroes: The Movie''. I'll try to get a screenshot soon. --[[User:Johans|Johans Nidorino]] 07:27, 18 May 2007 (UTC) | :Watching the movie, the logo shows the title as ''Pokémon Heroes: Latios & Latias''. On the other hand, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Pok%C3%A9mon_Heroes.jpg the DVD itself] (containing the movie and the Pikachu Short) could be read as ''Pokémon Heroes: The Movie''. I'll try to get a screenshot soon. --[[User:Johans|Johans Nidorino]] 07:27, 18 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Line 65: | Line 69: | ||
:[[EP256|''Just Add Water'']] and [[EP257|''Lapras of Luxury'']]. | :[[EP256|''Just Add Water'']] and [[EP257|''Lapras of Luxury'']]. | ||
:'''Note:''' Such trivia are ''not'' allowed anymore. They are redundant, confusing, and speculative. [[User:Adyniz|<span style="color:#009900;">'''Adyniz'''</span>]] — [[User talk:Adyniz|<span style="color:#003399;">'''Wanna talk?'''</span>]] 17:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC) | :'''Note:''' Such trivia are ''not'' allowed anymore. They are redundant, confusing, and speculative. [[User:Adyniz|<span style="color:#009900;">'''Adyniz'''</span>]] — [[User talk:Adyniz|<span style="color:#003399;">'''Wanna talk?'''</span>]] 17:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
Thank you very much [[User:RobbieNewton|RobbieNewton]] ([[User talk:RobbieNewton|talk]]) 22:26, 29 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
== [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=M05&diff=1879809&oldid=1879471 This Edit] == | |||
Sorry, I forgot to explain some edits. | |||
* '''Latios trivia:''' Parantheses should be avoided as much as possible | |||
* '''Cyrllic trivia:''' Concise wording | |||
* '''Tradition trivia:''' Fixed extremely confusing wording | |||
* '''Blu-ray trivia:''' Redundant | |||
* '''Opening cinematic errors:''' Reorganized and reworded. I played the Japanese version of the film and the English dub of the episode and made adjustments to the info here. Pikachu gives no indication that his attitude toward Ash is any different in the cinematic, so I removed that trivia. New errors added. | |||
* '''Dub edits:''' Concise wording, destroying parentheses, added contextually vital info to voice actor bullet. --<font face="Segoe UI"><span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em">[[User:IWannaBeTheVeryBest|<font color="red">IWanna</font>]]BeThe[[User talk:IWannaBeTheVeryBest|<font color="white">VeryBest</font>]]</span></font> 00:31, 11 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
== About the dub title == | |||
Shouldn't the title say '''Pokémon Heroes: Latios & Latias''' instead of just '''Pokémon Heroes'''? At least in the eng dub version, that's what the title card says.[[User:Raykyogrou0|<span style="color:blue">Raykyogrou0</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Raykyogrou0|<span style="color:black">Talk</span>]])''</small> 07:13, 5 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Movie 5 box office trivia. == | |||
Okay, currently PumpkinKing is trying to delete the box office trivia simply because it wasn't notable. However, it ran uncontested as having the lowest box office record for 13 years, which definitely is a very long time. I think we really should at the very least note that it definitely had the lowest box office record until then, since that is notable. I could understand claiming that until the immediate next movie was not notable, but not a film that was undisputably the lowest performing film up until a movie released over a decade later, as that definitely has grounds for notability precisely BECAUSE of how uncommon that is. [[User:Weedle Mchairybug|Weedle Mchairybug]] ([[User talk:Weedle Mchairybug|talk]]) 03:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:Mosts (and sometimes leasts) are notable; runners-up and used-to-be-mosts/leasts are not. Those are our trivia standards across all of our pages. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 03:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
::Why does the duration of it being the lowest grossing movie matter? If it's not longer the lowest, it's no longer the lowest.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#F1912B">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#F6B775">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#5599CA">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#90BDDC">ire</span>]] 05:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC) | |||