Talk:Energy: Difference between revisions
From Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon encyclopedia.
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
So, a disambig? [[User:Drake Clawfang|Drake Clawfang]] ([[User talk:Drake Clawfang|talk]]) 02:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC) | So, a disambig? [[User:Drake Clawfang|Drake Clawfang]] ([[User talk:Drake Clawfang|talk]]) 02:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
:When there are only two things that are referenced by the single term, and in cases like where one is vastly more notable than the other, the correct course of action is what is already being done: {{template|redirect}} being used on the more significant one. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 02:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC) | :When there are only two things that are referenced by the single term, and in cases like where one is vastly more notable than the other, the correct course of action is what is already being done: {{template|redirect}} being used on the more significant one. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 02:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
::Alright. Also, my apologies, rather foolishly I didn't notice the notice at the top of the page that was added. [[User:Drake Clawfang|Drake Clawfang]] ([[User talk:Drake Clawfang|talk]]) 03:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:13, 13 February 2016
Should this perhaps be disambiged between the TCG term and the Pokemon Conquest stat? Drake Clawfang (talk) 03:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- We don't have an article on Energy (Conquest) or even as a section on Statistic. There's no point in disambiguating it now if there's no where to link to. --Abcboy (talk) 03:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- I would be willing to make such an article/section. Drake Clawfang (talk) 03:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Feel free. I imagine that it would fit better on Statistic, like Belly from PMD, unless there's a lot of information to cover. --Abcboy (talk) 03:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Not really. I'll see what I can do. Drake Clawfang (talk) 03:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Feel free. I imagine that it would fit better on Statistic, like Belly from PMD, unless there's a lot of information to cover. --Abcboy (talk) 03:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- I would be willing to make such an article/section. Drake Clawfang (talk) 03:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Voila. Drake Clawfang (talk) 03:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
So, a disambig? Drake Clawfang (talk) 02:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- When there are only two things that are referenced by the single term, and in cases like where one is vastly more notable than the other, the correct course of action is what is already being done:
{{redirect}}being used on the more significant one. MaverickNate 02:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)- Alright. Also, my apologies, rather foolishly I didn't notice the notice at the top of the page that was added. Drake Clawfang (talk) 03:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
