19,673
edits
Talk:Shiny Pokémon/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
Talk:Shiny Pokémon/Featured article candidate (view source)
Revision as of 21:28, 10 February 2011
, 10 February 2011Protected "Talk:Shiny Pokémon/Featured article candidate": Closed vote. ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))
No edit summary |
m (Protected "Talk:Shiny Pokémon/Featured article candidate": Closed vote. ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))) |
||
| (24 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==[[Shiny Pokémon]]==__NOTOC__ | ==[[Shiny Pokémon]]==__NOTOC__ | ||
====Support ( | ====Support (11)==== | ||
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | <!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | ||
*I think this is a good article about game mechanics, plus who doesn't like Shiny guys? ----[[User:Desukaan563|<span style="color:blue">Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Desukaan563|<span style="color:yellow">talk</span>]])''</small> 08:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | *I think this is a good article about game mechanics, plus who doesn't like Shiny guys? ----[[User:Desukaan563|<span style="color:blue">Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Desukaan563|<span style="color:yellow">talk</span>]])''</small> 08:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
***Good job SnorlaxMonster! Hey, how often does it change? Even if this artcile isn't nominated, we could still put this on the page. Oh, do u support nominating this article? --[[User:Desukaan563|<span style="color:blue">Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Desukaan563|<span style="color:yellow">talk</span>]])''</small> 08:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC) | ***Good job SnorlaxMonster! Hey, how often does it change? Even if this artcile isn't nominated, we could still put this on the page. Oh, do u support nominating this article? --[[User:Desukaan563|<span style="color:blue">Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Desukaan563|<span style="color:yellow">talk</span>]])''</small> 08:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
**** It generates a random Pokémon by multiplying the total number of edits by the time in seconds (it also uses modulo to keep the number between 1 and 493). So it really changes every time you view the page, but you might have to hard refresh or purge the server's cache to see a change. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 10:40, 29 November 2010 (UTC) | **** It generates a random Pokémon by multiplying the total number of edits by the time in seconds (it also uses modulo to keep the number between 1 and 493). So it really changes every time you view the page, but you might have to hard refresh or purge the server's cache to see a change. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 10:40, 29 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
*****Could u up it to 649 once BW comes out in english? ----[[User:Desukaan563|<span style="color:blue">Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Desukaan563|<span style="color:yellow">talk</span>]])''</small> 09:56, 5 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
******It is all dependent on {{template|Num2N}}. When we get all the English names, it will be updated, and the random generator will be able to be updated to work for up to 649. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 12:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
* I support this wholeheartedly, it's a great article. <small>- ''unsigned comment from [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] ([[User talk:Missingno. Master|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Missingno._Master|contribs]])'' </small> 14:10, 27 November 2010 (UTC) | * I support this wholeheartedly, it's a great article. <small>- ''unsigned comment from [[User:Missingno. Master|Missingno. Master]] ([[User talk:Missingno. Master|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Missingno._Master|contribs]])'' </small> 14:10, 27 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
* I support this because I believe it quite well written and it is a great article on the subject. --[[User:Laikue|<span style="color:blue">User:Laikue]] 11:40, 08 December 2010 (CST)-- | * I support this because I believe it quite well written and it is a great article on the subject. --[[User:Laikue|<span style="color:blue">User:Laikue</span>]] 11:40, 08 December 2010 (CST)-- | ||
*Good article. [[User:A Person|A person]] wrote this at 00:38, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | *Good article. [[User:A Person|A person]] wrote this at 00:38, 15 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
*One of the best articles related with Pokémon on Bulbapedia... Amitrc7th 05:30, 18 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
*Great article. Only one thing I could complain about, and it's not even that big of a complaint. Eliza 04:01, 30 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
*Great article. I have visited many times and found it useful(which is what Bulbapedia is for right?) And besides, Shinies Are Awesome![[User:Arceus97|Arceus97]] 04:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
* Interesting article with solid information. Looks like a winner to me. --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#00B7EB">''P''</span> <span style="color:#008080">''o''</span>]] [[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#0095B6">''L''</span> <span style="color:#00CCCC">''i''</span>]] 20:36, 3 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
other than what i said in the object section its an excellent article--[[User:Glalie Power|Glalie Power]] 20:39, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
*Great article. Has a [[game]], [[anime]], and [[TCG]] view.--[[User:Breawycker|Breawycker]] 00:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
*The article provides great information about Shiny Pokémon. It is well rounded and helps users with predicting Shiny Pokémon appearance. [[User:Pokemon59|Pokemon59]] 20:37, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
====Object ( | ====Object (6)==== | ||
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | <!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | ||
*Nah, it feels kind of...incomplete to me..like it could have more..[[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 14:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC) | *Nah, it feels kind of...incomplete to me..like it could have more..[[User:Ataro|Ataro]] 14:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 20: | Line 29: | ||
****I don't know much about the magna, but if there is someone who does, could they write the section on it? That would be useful and improve the article, also it would be a good idea to link to the Red Gyarados article. ----[[User:Desukaan563|<span style="color:blue">Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Desukaan563|<span style="color:yellow">talk</span>]])''</small> 03:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC) | ****I don't know much about the magna, but if there is someone who does, could they write the section on it? That would be useful and improve the article, also it would be a good idea to link to the Red Gyarados article. ----[[User:Desukaan563|<span style="color:blue">Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Desukaan563|<span style="color:yellow">talk</span>]])''</small> 03:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
*While the article seems mostly complete, I don't feel it's feature quality. The page format is plain, and the sections, and by extension the article as a whole, are really short. Feature articles should be pages which go above and beyond most others, and I don't think this one is up to snuff. --[[User:AndyPKMN|Andy<sup>P</sup><sub>K</sub><sup>M</sup><sub>N</sub>]] [[User talk:AndyPKMN|(talk)]] 12:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC) | *While the article seems mostly complete, I don't feel it's feature quality. The page format is plain, and the sections, and by extension the article as a whole, are really short. Feature articles should be pages which go above and beyond most others, and I don't think this one is up to snuff. --[[User:AndyPKMN|Andy<sup>P</sup><sub>K</sub><sup>M</sup><sub>N</sub>]] [[User talk:AndyPKMN|(talk)]] 12:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Well, like ＤＥＮＮＯＵ ＺＥＮＳＨ already said, it is as good as Ilex Forest shrine, and covers more games/generations.----[[User:Desukaan563|<span style="color:blue">Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Desukaan563|<span style="color:yellow">talk</span>]])''</small> 08:18, 20 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
*No mention of Colosseum/XD shiny Pokemon, which can be vastly different from the main game shinys, for example Vileplume or Voltorb. <small><span style="color:white; background-color:blue">'''X'''</span>[[User:Vuvuzela2010|<span style="color:blue; background-color:white">'''Vuvuzela2010''']]</span><span style="color:white; background-color:blue">'''X'''</span></small> 22:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
*I felt that it should go into the pros and cons of hacking shiny Pokémon because someone offered me a hacked Shiny and I ''still'' don't know whether I should have accepted or if I should accept it in the future... Eliza 04:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
**Well, don't pay too highly for it. If it is a legend, it is worth a fairly common legend, if not, hacked would be worth someone fairly rare, though not that rare. I paid a Lv. 60 Honchcrow for a shiny pichu, who may or may not be hacked, but that gives u a basic idea. ----[[User:Desukaan563|<span style="color:blue">Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Desukaan563|<span style="color:yellow">talk</span>]])''</small> 03:00, 31 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
***A Shiny Pokémon hacked in the normal way should be identical to a legitimate one, except that they are often obtained where they cannot usually be obtained, so the location is often wrong. However, this information should not be added to the page. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 11:11, 1 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
****Really hacked shinies hardly need a mention on the shiny page, more for the Bulbagarden Forums.----[[User:Desukaan563|<span style="color:blue">Desukaan563's userpage has a Value Formula to measure Pokémon worth</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Desukaan563|<span style="color:yellow">talk</span>]])''</small> 09:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
* its good but it should say if shinys have higher stat averages than normal | |||
** They don't have...----'''''無限の知性''''' ◎ [[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#BF0B17">ＤＥＮＮＯＵ</font>]]'''[[Special:Random|◆]]'''[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#1250A6">ＺＥＮＳＨＩ</font>]] 20:42, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
[[File:Box Colo 352 s.png|right|thumb|A yellow Kecleon]] | |||
* Repeating myself above, shiny's from Colosseum & XD really need a mention, for example shiny Kecleon in the handheld games are green, while the ones in Colo/XD are Yellow. <small><span style="color:white; background-color:blue">'''X'''</span>[[User:Vuvuzela2010|<span style="color:blue; background-color:white">'''Vuvuzela2010''']]</span><span style="color:white; background-color:blue">'''X'''</span></small> 21:04, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
====Other comments==== | ====Other comments==== | ||