User talk:Unknowen900: Difference between revisions
Unknowen900 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (→Talk Page: new section) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
This is my Talk Page, and I believe I am allowed to passive-aggressively<ref>Or nicely if I feel like it.</ref> comment on it. | This is my Talk Page, and I believe I am allowed to passive-aggressively<ref>Or nicely if I feel like it.</ref> comment on it. | ||
<References> </References> | <References> </References> | ||
== Talk Page == | |||
Please try to avoid excessively posting and/or editing comments here; it counts as userspace, and it is counterproductive. Remember the preview key. —[[User:Oz|<span style="color:#800000">'''オ'''</span>]][[User talk:Oz|<span style="color:#C8A2C8">'''ッ'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Oz|<span style="color:#01015E">'''ズ'''</span>]] @ 14:40, 2 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:40, 2 December 2010
You may be wondering why my user page redirected you to my talk page. Simply put, I don't have a user page as yet, so this will have to suffice. — Unknowen900 14:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome
Please don't edit other peoples messages. Hasn't been a problem, but just don't.
Haha, woooow
Way to flip out for no reason. Version Exclusive Pokémon are certain Pokémon that are AVAILIBLE IN THE WILD depending on which version. This is why Weedle and Caterpie were not included in the Black and White list,[1] as they can only be obtained in the game either by breeding or transferring from Generation IV games or from the Dream World.[2] - 050294 05:01, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- He lost in the end, and his logic was invalid. We both got suspended, me shorter than him, and while we were gone, a fourth party (a third party had already changed it in disagreement with him) changed it back to the original form of the page. 050294 seriously thought that earlier stages of Pokémon that can only be found in one version but themselves cannot be found in either version do not count as such, and that later stages of Pokémon which can be found in either version but they themselves can only be found in one do count. I do not understand or care for this logic, and the community has been seen to disagree with it. I may not be clear with what I mean by this, but I hope you understand what I mean by his opinion being completely illogical. — Unknowen900 14:19, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Edit Warring
It is very against the rules. There is no reason to edit war when there's a talk page begging to be used for discussion. As per the rules you are blocked one day per revert, minus the initial edit. You reverted 2 times, so you are being blocked for 2 days. Heed this warning, and you will return a better user. -- MAGNEDETH 05:26, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Commentry
This is my Talk Page, and I believe I am allowed to passive-aggressively[3] comment on it.
- ↑ Added and decided on by him and him only.
- ↑ But in order to get it in the other version, you need to trade with the one it is a Version Exclusive of. So, entire point is ridiculous and invalid.
- ↑ Or nicely if I feel like it.
Talk Page
Please try to avoid excessively posting and/or editing comments here; it counts as userspace, and it is counterproductive. Remember the preview key. —オッズ @ 14:40, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
