Talk:Vicious's Tyranitar

Are pages like this all that necessary? I mean, yes, Vicious was an important character in Movie 4, but do all of his Pokémon really need a profile? --PAK Man 04:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I honestly don't think so, but eh, if someone can write enough on it without getting too far into fanon, why not? --T T Echidna 04:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I believe there are some other minor character's pokémon out there. TheBlazikenMaster 09:44, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I still say this article as well as several others (ie, Drew's Butterfree, Paul's Azumarill, Zoey's Shellos) are completely unneccesary. --PAK Man ^Talk 15:06, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I understand how you feel about this article, but what about Drew's Butterfree? Drew is a recurring character. He makes many appearances while May steps into a Pokémon Contest. TheBlazikenMaster 15:09, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

But Drew's Butterfree hasn't done enough to warrant an article of its own. The same with Paul's Azumarill. Zoey's Shellos is harder to tell since it will appear again in the near future. --FabuVinny ^T-C-S 15:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

You got a good point there. One time appearance pokémon from one time appearance characters don't deserve their own articles. I will join the anime Project of this Wiki. Yes, you bet I will. TheBlazikenMaster 15:29, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Since all the other articles in this category got deleted, I think this should be deleted as well. Jm a th 13:57, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

But this was his signature Pokémon--Kuki Talk 15:44, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

But we don't have pages for movie character's Pokémon. Jm a th 12:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

I agree it should be removed, but since this site doesn't have AfD, what would be the best substitute for that? I really want some place to end the discussion about whether this Tyranitar deserves its own page. TheBlazikenMaster 20:42, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

I like the older image better.

I mean it shows it using a powerful Hyper Beam, isn't that cool? I like it better than the one that's up now. TheBlazikenMaster 15:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok, can we please discuss this? Because apparently, we aren't agreeing on what image to use. TheBlazikenMaster 14:23, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I think my image is better because it's better quality and Vicious is in the picture! The old pic could mean it's a random Tyranitar!--Kuki Talk 14:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh I never thought of that, you're right it can be ANY Tyranitar using Hyper Beam. Thanks for giving me a reason to agree with you. TheBlazikenMaster 14:38, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. I found it on the Pokémon Nightmare gallery. In fact, all images I upload come from there--Kuki Talk 14:41, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

What's wrong with the current picture?

If we must keep the bad picture template, there must be an answer to that question. TheBlazikenMaster 20:26, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps because it cut's Tyranitar off slightly? Naww. I think it's fine too. I'll get rid of it. TESHIGIGAS 20:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

ONCE AND FOR ALL

Can we please, ONCE AND FOR ALL decide which image to use??? People have been arguing for weeks. I support the first image. --Theryguy 512 02:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

I prefer the second image. =/ It doesn't have the smeared feeling to it and it looks much cleaner. SL-sama^contribs 04:12, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Indeed, second image. The first is small, half-body image. It also shows its Trainer with it, which is quite good. Sorry Ry,. ►Ҝə υz ø8 04:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

i dont think either of them are all that good, but of the two, the second one. -- MAG NE DETH 04:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)