411
edits
User talk:Jazzmoth: Difference between revisions
→Rumble Tables
m (→Rumble Tables) |
|||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
The 6 Rumble tables you made are barely informative... every Pokémon is listed as being in every rank, unless I am seriously misinterpreting it. If I'm wrong, just tell me, but otherwise I suggest you revert the articles to when they were just in a list. [[User:Sidnoea|Sidnoea]] 05:24, 16 January 2010 (UTC) | The 6 Rumble tables you made are barely informative... every Pokémon is listed as being in every rank, unless I am seriously misinterpreting it. If I'm wrong, just tell me, but otherwise I suggest you revert the articles to when they were just in a list. [[User:Sidnoea|Sidnoea]] 05:24, 16 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I think the list format was uninformative, since one could not see which stages a particular Pokémon is present or absent. As I mentioned, reformatting the tables is a great idea (especially if they have the sort buttons), but I think that reverting to lists is messy and amateur. (Sorry for the double response, just in case!) [[User:Jazzmoth|<b><span style="color:#0000cc">Jazz</span><span style="color:#ff3300">moth</span></b>]] 05:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC) | :I think the list format was uninformative, since one could not see which stages a particular Pokémon is present or absent. As I mentioned, reformatting the tables is a great idea (especially if they have the sort buttons), but I think that reverting to lists is messy and amateur. (Sorry for the double response, just in case!) [[User:Jazzmoth|<b><span style="color:#0000cc">Jazz</span><span style="color:#ff3300">moth</span></b>]] 05:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Well, although the coding says otherwise, the letters all appear black. Here's an idea: put an X in the column if they are in that rank, and leave the column blank if they are not. Very simple, and does not require "browser coding". Not sure what the deal with that is =/ [[User:Sidnoea|Sidnoea]] 05:55, 16 January 2010 (UTC) | |||