2,743
edits
Bulbapedia talk:Project Moves and Abilities: Difference between revisions
Bulbapedia talk:Project Moves and Abilities (view source)
Revision as of 02:48, 2 January 2010
, 2 January 2010→Inconsistency on Generation I
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 377: | Line 377: | ||
Personally, I think that we should just have everything listed at its face value, ignoring the 1/256 chance. The only time people really would care is when the "100%" things miss, and it would be kind of extreme to have every move have a Genration I Accuracy line. But that's just my opinion. Any thoughts? [[User:Schreiber|Schreiber]] 23:09, 1 January 2010 (UTC) | Personally, I think that we should just have everything listed at its face value, ignoring the 1/256 chance. The only time people really would care is when the "100%" things miss, and it would be kind of extreme to have every move have a Genration I Accuracy line. But that's just my opinion. Any thoughts? [[User:Schreiber|Schreiber]] 23:09, 1 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I'm in favor of fixing these for consistency. Like you said, the 1/256 chance isn't tied to each move, it's the whole battle system, so technically, those move effects have a 30% chance of triggering, not 29.7% (the 1/256 chance is more or less seperate). | |||
:The subtleties of the Gen. I battle system can be listed in higher articles (such as the ones on Gen. I in general), so I'll say it's better to list the move effects without that 1/256 chance taken into account. (I believe I've occasionally edited some moves as such already, anyway.) --[[user:Jioruji_Derako|<font color="#237d00"> '''J'''ïörüjï '''Ð'''ērākō.'''>'''</font>]]<small>[[user talk:Jioruji Derako|<font color="#237d00">''.cнаt'''''^'''</font>]]</small> 02:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC) | |||