1
edit
Talk:Egg Group: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→Trivia: Egg Groups Graph: Nice! =D) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
:I think it will probably be necessary to breed within some egg groups in order to get to the end of this, but maybe not. I have rather cleverly confused myself, so I hope anyone reading this can follow :D — <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] — 07:49, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | :I think it will probably be necessary to breed within some egg groups in order to get to the end of this, but maybe not. I have rather cleverly confused myself, so I hope anyone reading this can follow :D — <small>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<font color="#0000C8">THE TROM</font></small>]] — 07:49, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Hm,'kay that's basically what I wanted to know, indeed. So, that means you ''can'' breed any egg group with another egg group. Impressive. -- [[User:Pro-mole|Professional Mole]] ([[User talk:Pro-mole|<small>Talk here</small>]]) 15:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | ::Hm,'kay that's basically what I wanted to know, indeed. So, that means you ''can'' breed any egg group with another egg group. Impressive. -- [[User:Pro-mole|Professional Mole]] ([[User talk:Pro-mole|<small>Talk here</small>]]) 15:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
==Gender%== | |||
Personally I would find it useful if, in the individual egg group pages, there was a portion of the table that listed gender percentages. The most useful application would be in the mineral group to identify which species are genderless at a glance. Secondly, to identify species which have no females/males. I feel this change would only enhance the pages as references for breeding. I'm not asking for someone else to do it, I'm asking if (and how) it should be done. [[User:Githe|Githe]] 13:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||