767
edits
User talk:Unown Lord: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Unown Lord (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Unown Lord (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
:*Do you know what the word "presumably" means? It clarifies that this is nothing more than an educated guess at this point. Now, it is a valid claim that any Pokémon not found in Johto will not be listed in the Johto Dex, which is not identical to the New Dex. If the article actually said which Pokémon were exclusive to Kanto, then you'd have a point about there being too much speculation and too little evidence. That said, I do agree that stipulating that only Generation I Pokémon could be excluded might create the impression that the information has been confirmed, considering that a few Generation II Pokémon were also missing from Generation II Johto (notably the Larvitar line, which appear after Lapras in the New Dex, though I considerably doubt they will be excluded). I've revised the sentence to account for this. | :*Do you know what the word "presumably" means? It clarifies that this is nothing more than an educated guess at this point. Now, it is a valid claim that any Pokémon not found in Johto will not be listed in the Johto Dex, which is not identical to the New Dex. If the article actually said which Pokémon were exclusive to Kanto, then you'd have a point about there being too much speculation and too little evidence. That said, I do agree that stipulating that only Generation I Pokémon could be excluded might create the impression that the information has been confirmed, considering that a few Generation II Pokémon were also missing from Generation II Johto (notably the Larvitar line, which appear after Lapras in the New Dex, though I considerably doubt they will be excluded). I've revised the sentence to account for this. | ||
:I'll add the Generation I starters, fossils and legendaries to the other article, since they can't be ruled out at this point. -- | :I'll add the Generation I starters, fossils and legendaries to the other article, since they can't be ruled out at this point. --Unown Lord 18:34, 10 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
::On second thought, I've decided to remove the list of missing numbers, as I find it redundant and misleading. -- | ::On second thought, I've decided to remove the list of missing numbers, as I find it redundant and misleading. --Unown Lord | ||