14,032
edits
Bulbapedia talk:Manual of style/Anime/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Bulbapedia talk:Manual of style/Anime/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 11:43, 13 May 2009
, 13 May 2009no edit summary
ElectAbuzzzz (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::{{an|Hippopotas}}, {{an|Spoink}} and {{an|Wynaut}} will be merged to one article, according to the rule. And ''some'' of the gym leader articles you mentioned are not only called into question, they're just downright not notable according to this - which is ''exactly the point''. Do you really think we need [[Koga's Venomoth]]? | :::{{an|Hippopotas}}, {{an|Spoink}} and {{an|Wynaut}} will be merged to one article, according to the rule. And ''some'' of the gym leader articles you mentioned are not only called into question, they're just downright not notable according to this - which is ''exactly the point''. Do you really think we need [[Koga's Venomoth]]? | ||
:::That specific rule was talked about more than any other, both on the forums and on the AIM meeting, and the important part of it, as most of the people there saw it, was the ''out of battle'' thing. If it did nothing but battle, it's not notable. It had no impact. As for the other medias - well, if they were in the games or TCG it doesn't matter much - because it has no role in the games and already has its own article in the TCG. I could see the significance if it's a major manga role, but in most cases the manga role isn't that big either. --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|'''<span style="color:#ED9121">electAbuzz</span>''']][[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|'''<span style="color:#ED9121">zz</span>''']] 14:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC) | :::That specific rule was talked about more than any other, both on the forums and on the AIM meeting, and the important part of it, as most of the people there saw it, was the ''out of battle'' thing. If it did nothing but battle, it's not notable. It had no impact. As for the other medias - well, if they were in the games or TCG it doesn't matter much - because it has no role in the games and already has its own article in the TCG. I could see the significance if it's a major manga role, but in most cases the manga role isn't that big either. --[[User:ElectAbuzzzz|'''<span style="color:#ED9121">electAbuzz</span>''']][[User talk:ElectAbuzzzz|'''<span style="color:#ED9121">zz</span>''']] 14:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::I gotta say, I think you and I have the exact same mindset sometimes. I agree completely with all of these guidelines, and feel that this notability policy is just what Bulbapedia needs. On a side note, when did we get an article about [[Koga's Venomoth]]? Have I really been absent that long? --[[User:PAK Man|PAK Man]] <sup>[[User talk:PAK Man|Talk]]</sup> 11:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC) | |||