2,613
edits
Talk:Roost (move): Difference between revisions
→Which brings up a point...
Blueapple128 (talk | contribs) |
Blueapple128 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:Although I haven't tested it myself personally, odds are the programmers knew combinations like this were a possibility and programmed for those. It's a lot like {{t|???}}-type {{p|Arceus}}, actually...--[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 17:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC) | :Although I haven't tested it myself personally, odds are the programmers knew combinations like this were a possibility and programmed for those. It's a lot like {{t|???}}-type {{p|Arceus}}, actually...--[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 17:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::The user of Roost effectively becomes ???-type for the rest of the turn. It will have no resistances or weaknesses. However, I'm not sure if it really became ???-type in the game's data, or if it just has <b>no</b> type at all. | ::The user of Roost effectively becomes ???-type for the rest of the turn. It will have no resistances or weaknesses. However, I'm not sure if it really became ???-type in the game's data, or if it just has <b>no</b> type at all. (A possible way to test this would be either hack the ROM to make ???-type have certain weaknesses or resistances, or hack a Sky Plate Arceus with Roost and see if it changes formes after Roost.) | ||
(A possible way to test this would be either hack the ROM to make ???-type have certain weaknesses or resistances, or hack a Sky Plate Arceus with Roost and see if it changes formes after Roost.) | |||
[[User:Blueapple128|Blueapple128]] 23:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | [[User:Blueapple128|Blueapple128]] 23:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | ||