16,425
edits
Talk:DP100: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Tavisource (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Fabu-Vinny (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::: Personally I think this getting really ridiculous. If we apply this logic then technically we shouldn't know of DP 100 or DP 99. I mean if tv guides are somehow lying (which I believe newtype is, and not some random fan created magazine) then we shouldn't have anything beyond the confirmed Aoi episode. I mean its ridiculous to pick and choose what "one" person wants. Either you believe in all tv guides and "all" their information, or we shouldn't believe them at all. Which means we'll need to delete the The Aaron and the Turtwig/Grotle/Torterra episodes because as far as the same logic goes none of them exists either. Seriously just because a summary says a Pokemon evolves its somehow questioned, but not any other information of other episodes. I'm sorry I don't like the "you can have it both ways" rule of Bulbapedia. Should we have a rule that says its not confirmed until the preview or until it airs. --[[User:Dman dustin|Dman dustin]] 03:11, 11 October 2008 (UTC) | :::: Personally I think this getting really ridiculous. If we apply this logic then technically we shouldn't know of DP 100 or DP 99. I mean if tv guides are somehow lying (which I believe newtype is, and not some random fan created magazine) then we shouldn't have anything beyond the confirmed Aoi episode. I mean its ridiculous to pick and choose what "one" person wants. Either you believe in all tv guides and "all" their information, or we shouldn't believe them at all. Which means we'll need to delete the The Aaron and the Turtwig/Grotle/Torterra episodes because as far as the same logic goes none of them exists either. Seriously just because a summary says a Pokemon evolves its somehow questioned, but not any other information of other episodes. I'm sorry I don't like the "you can have it both ways" rule of Bulbapedia. Should we have a rule that says its not confirmed until the preview or until it airs. --[[User:Dman dustin|Dman dustin]] 03:11, 11 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::::That would cause many problems...everyone would be fighting to edit the page all at once.--[[Bulbapedia:Project Custom Sprite|<font color="brown"><small>☆</small></font>]][[User:Tavisource|<font color="teal">Tavis</font>]][[User talk:Tavisource|<font color="gray"><small>ource</small></font>]] 03:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC) | ::::::That would cause many problems...everyone would be fighting to edit the page all at once.--[[Bulbapedia:Project Custom Sprite|<font color="brown"><small>☆</small></font>]][[User:Tavisource|<font color="teal">Tavis</font>]][[User talk:Tavisource|<font color="gray"><small>ource</small></font>]] 03:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
...You know, when three members of the editorial board add the same information, normally that's a sign that it should be in the article. Seriously, this is Newtype we're talking about. It's the most reliable source we have and the info from it has never been doubted before now. --[[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] <sup>|[[User talk:Fabu-Vinny|Talk Page]]|</sup> 15:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC) | |||