2,362
edits
User talk:User142: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
m (→Walkthorughs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please use sentence case in section and article titles - that is to say, capitalise as if you were writing a sentence, rather than as if you were writing a book title. - [[User:Zhen Lin|振霖]]<sub>[[User talk:Zhen Lin|T]]</sub> 06:13, 9 November 2005 (CST) | Please use sentence case in section and article titles - that is to say, capitalise as if you were writing a sentence, rather than as if you were writing a book title. - [[User:Zhen Lin|振霖]]<sub>[[User talk:Zhen Lin|T]]</sub> 06:13, 9 November 2005 (CST) | ||
= Type effectiveness numbers = | |||
I'd like to ask where you're getting your numbers. [[Latias (Pokémon)#Type effectiveness]] has truly bizarre numbers compared to [http://pokefor.greenchu.de/zukan/gba/pokemon/latias/type PokéFor's figures]. - [[User:Zhen Lin|振霖]]<sub>[[User talk:Zhen Lin|T]]</sub> 06:41, 9 November 2005 (CST) | |||
For the physical attack types, I start with 100 and apply weakness/resistance according to the normal rules. For special types, I start with 100*defense/special defense, which allows for better representation of damage ratios. For example, a {{t|Psychic}} move would do about 1.5 times as much damage to a {{p|Geodude}} as a {{t|Fighting}} move of the same strength; just looking as weakness/resistance would make it look like Figting is twice as strong as Psychic.[[User:User142|User142]] 07:48, 9 November 2005 (CST) | For the physical attack types, I start with 100 and apply weakness/resistance according to the normal rules. For special types, I start with 100*defense/special defense, which allows for better representation of damage ratios. For example, a {{t|Psychic}} move would do about 1.5 times as much damage to a {{p|Geodude}} as a {{t|Fighting}} move of the same strength; just looking as weakness/resistance would make it look like Figting is twice as strong as Psychic.[[User:User142|User142]] 07:48, 9 November 2005 (CST) | ||