51,133
edits
User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 40708-70708: Difference between revisions
User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 40708-70708 (view source)
Revision as of 14:43, 8 July 2008
, 8 July 2008no edit summary
Politoed666 (talk | contribs) m (→User:Drapion: new section) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 878: | Line 878: | ||
He's gone around inserting "-30" into all the weakness sections of old sets. It's self-evident that the resistances were -30, because ''all of them were until {{TCG|Diamond & Pearl}}''. I'm going to ask him to stop until further notice. When you get online, please give me your take on this. --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">ニョロトノ</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">''666''</span>]] 14:25, 8 July 2008 (UTC) | He's gone around inserting "-30" into all the weakness sections of old sets. It's self-evident that the resistances were -30, because ''all of them were until {{TCG|Diamond & Pearl}}''. I'm going to ask him to stop until further notice. When you get online, please give me your take on this. --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">ニョロトノ</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">''666''</span>]] 14:25, 8 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Actually, I'm fine with the Resistances either way, just as long as the "-30" doesn't get put back onto {{TCG ID|Neo Revelation|Zubat|59}}. The Trivia section on that page will explain why. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 14:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC) | |||